Texas 2023 - 88th Regular

Texas House Bill HB2073

Filed
2/8/23  
Out of House Committee
4/20/23  
Voted on by House
5/2/23  
Out of Senate Committee
5/10/23  
Voted on by Senate
5/15/23  
Governor Action
5/27/23  

Caption

Relating to the recovery of fuel and purchased power costs by electric utilities.

Impact

If enacted, HB 2073 would notably alter the statutory framework governing electric utility operations in Texas. The bill mandates that utilities must apply for reconciliation of their fuel and purchased power costs at least once every two years. It also establishes a 90-day threshold for any adjustments that would impact total billing significantly. These procedures aim to ensure that adjustments occur in a timely manner, reducing the complexity and length of the reconciliation process, which traditionally has required significant administrative involvement.

Summary

House Bill 2073 is designed to streamline the recovery process for fuel and purchased power costs by electric utilities operating in non-ERCOT areas of Texas. The bill seeks to synchronize the timing of utility fuel expense recovery with customer billing, thereby establishing a more efficient and responsive adjustment process. This change recognizes the complications in the current system that often delay appropriate adjustments, causing utilities to experience significant under-collection or over-collection of their fuel costs, which in turn affects customer bills.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 2073 appears to be predominantly positive among key stakeholders. Supporters, such as representatives from Excel Energy and the Association of Electric Companies of Texas, advocate that the proposed changes would simplify utility operations and customer billing while providing necessary protection for both utilities and consumers. However, there are concerns from some individuals about the complexity of fuel reconciliation being inadequately addressed, with arguments that the reconciliation of fuel costs is a more nuanced process than the bill suggests.

Contention

The main points of contention involve the balance between simplifying the billing adjustment process and adequately addressing the complexities of fuel cost reconciliations. Opponents voice concern over potential oversimplification that might lead to inaccuracies in billing or inadequate consumer protections. The issue of timing and the potential for significant bill increases in adjustment scenarios poses challenges. If implemented, the bill could significantly change how utilities manage and communicate fuel cost changes to their customers, impacting both consumer trust and utility revenue.

Texas Constitutional Statutes Affected

Utilities Code

  • Chapter 36. Rates
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: New Section

Companion Bills

TX SB1095

Identical Relating to the recovery of fuel and purchased power costs by electric utilities.

Similar Bills

IN SB0005

Lead water line replacement and lead remediation.

NJ A5553

Requires BPU to establish best practices and to assess electric public utilities' compliance with BPU best practices during BPU's review of rate increase.

TX HB3230

Relating to a capacity cost recovery rider for certain electric utilities.

TX SB1856

Relating to a capacity cost recovery rider for certain electric utilities.

IN SB0009

Energy utilities.

NJ A5660

Requires BPU to publish plain language summary of its final decision on rate increase filings.

TX SB1095

Relating to the recovery of fuel and purchased power costs by electric utilities.

KS HB2527

Authorizing electric public utilities to recover certain depreciation and construction work in progress expenses and limiting the time that such recovery may be implemented, authorizing the provision of economic development electric rates for certain large electric customers and limiting the time that such rates may be implemented, extending the timeline for the state corporation commission to issue an order in ratemaking treatment proceedings, authorizing electric public utilities to retain certain generating facilities in the utilty's rate base, prohibiting the commission from authorizing the retirement of certain generating facilities unless certain requirements are met, increasing the capacity limitation for the total amount of net metering facilities that may operate in the service territory of an investor-owned electric public utility, requiring net metering facilities to be appropriately sized based on the customer's average load and establishing requirements for exporting power from a net metering system to a utility.