Texas 2023 - 88th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB677

Voted on by Senate
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to grand jury proceedings.

Impact

If enacted, SB 677 will impact the existing frameworks governing grand jury activities by explicitly providing the accused or their attorneys an opportunity to address the grand jury. This development highlights a significant shift towards ensuring that accused individuals are afforded legal representation during grand jury proceedings, which may help in safeguarding their rights and thereby promote a fairer judicial process. The bill establishes guidelines on who may be present in the grand jury room and clarifies the roles and rights of various participants.

Summary

Senate Bill 677 focuses on amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure regarding grand jury proceedings. The bill aims to enhance the legal representation available to accused or suspected individuals during grand jury sessions. Notably, it allows for attorneys representing these individuals to directly present their cases and respond to inquiries from grand jurors, thereby creating an avenue for the defense to have a voice in what is typically a closed proceeding. This potentially shifts the balance of power within grand jury hearings, giving accused persons greater access to legal counsel during these critical stages of the judicial process.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around SB 677 appears to be positive among legal advocacy groups and defense attorneys who believe that increased representation for defendants during grand jury proceedings is a necessary reform. Supporters argue that this measure promotes transparency and fairness in the criminal justice system. However, there may be concerns from some factions within the legal community or law enforcement about potential delays in the grand jury process or the degree of influence that defense lawyers might have in these proceedings.

Contention

While the bill may be met with support for enhancing the rights of the accused, there are likely to be points of contention regarding its implications. Critics may argue that allowing attorneys to appear before the grand jury could change the dynamics of these proceedings, possibly complicating the process and leading to challenges in cases where the grand jury's decision-making could be perceived as being influenced by defense counsel. Additionally, there is skepticism regarding the overall impact on the efficiency of grand jury proceedings, as allowing for defense presentations could create longer sessions and additional legal complexities.

Texas Constitutional Statutes Affected

Code Of Criminal Procedure

  • Chapter 20a. Grand Jury Proceedings
    • Section: New Section

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

IL SB2087

STATES ATTY-PEACE OFCR-PRIVACY

IL SB3671

STATES ATTY-PEACE OFCR-PRIVACY

CA SB605

State attorneys and administrative law judges: compensation.

CA AB1163

Minors: power of attorney to care for a minor child.

CA SB1109

Adoption.

CA SB710

District attorneys: conflicts of interest.

CA AB2083

Public utilities: rates.

CA AB894

Attorney General: directors and employees: exemption from civil service.