Urging Congress to enhance coordination among federal, state, and local authorities in the deployment of C-UAS technologies for border security.
This resolution seeks to address the limitations imposed on states by federal laws, which currently confine C-UAS operations to federal authorities only. By urging Congress to empower state and local agencies with C-UAS capabilities, HCR98 aims to enhance collaboration and leverage local knowledge in combating UAS threats. This could lead to improved efficiency in border security operations, ultimately contributing to the safety of citizens. Additionally, it seeks funding for states to cover the costs associated with acquiring and operating C-UAS technology, which could further bolster local law enforcement's operational capabilities.
HCR98 is a concurrent resolution that calls on the United States Congress to enhance the coordination between federal, state, and local entities regarding the deployment of Counter-Unmanned Aircraft Systems (C-UAS) technologies aimed at securing the U.S.-Mexico border. The bill emphasizes the complexities involved in border security and the significant role of state and local partners, particularly in light of the challenges posed by unmanned aerial systems (UAS). It argues that current federal statutes limit state involvement in UAS detection and mitigation, thus highlighting a gap in border security efforts.
Debates surrounding HCR98 are likely to focus on the balance of power between federal and state authorities in managing border security. Proponents of the resolution argue for the necessity of expanding C-UAS authority to local entities, particularly in border regions where the risks from UAS are heightened. On the other hand, there may be concerns regarding the implications of such authority, including the potential for misuse of drone technology and the overarching need for federal oversight to maintain uniform standards in national security operations. Some may argue that unregulated access for local authorities could lead to inconsistencies in operational protocols.