Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1484

Filed
2/20/25  
Out of Senate Committee
3/26/25  
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the marketing and sale of catfish and similar fish by food service establishments, food service suppliers, wholesalers, distributors, and wholesale distributors; providing administrative and civil penalties.

Impact

The implications of SB1484 are significant for state laws concerning food labeling and safety regulations. By defining regulations around seafood marketing, the bill aims to protect both consumers and legitimize the catfish industry, which can suffer from unfair competition from mislabeled fish products. The introduction of penalties for misrepresentation is designed to deter potential violators and ensure that the authenticity of seafood is maintained, thus impacting standards for food service operations statewide.

Summary

SB1484 aims to regulate the marketing and sale of catfish and similar fish by food service establishments, suppliers, wholesalers, and distributors. The bill specifies that food products may only be labeled as catfish if they indeed contain catfish and not any similar species. This legislative move ensures that consumers are not misled about the type of fish they are purchasing, thereby promoting transparency in the seafood market. The bill also establishes administrative and civil penalties for violations, reinforcing the importance of compliance within the food service industry.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB1484 appears to be favorable among supporters of food safety and consumer protection, who view the bill as a necessary step in preventing fraud in the seafood market. However, there could be some apprehension from those within the industry that may face stricter scrutiny and penalties. Opposition may arise from entities concerned about the regulatory burden that could result from compliance requirements, although these concerns have not been prominently documented in the provided discussions thus far.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB1484 may involve the balance between consumer protection and the potential for over-regulation that food service establishments could face. Some stakeholders might argue that while the intention is good, the added regulations and penalties could impose unnecessary challenges for small businesses that already operate on thin margins. Additionally, the enforcement aspect, including how penalties will be assessed and the underlying administrative actions taken, may become contentious as the bill moves towards implementation.

Texas Constitutional Statutes Affected

Health And Safety Code

  • Chapter 436. Aquatic Life
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: New Section
  • Chapter 431. Texas Food, Drug, And Cosmetic Act
    • Section: New Section
  • Chapter 437. Regulation Of Food Service Establishments, Retail Food Stores, Mobile Food Units, And Roadside Food Vendors
    • Section: New Section

Companion Bills

TX HB2976

Identical Relating to the marketing and sale of catfish and similar fish by food service establishments; providing administrative and civil penalties.

Similar Bills

LA HB502

Provides relative to dealer warranty compensation

FL H0283

Storage and Disposal of Prescription Drugs and Sharps

LA HB591

Creates a subcommittee for the Motor Vehicle Commission

KY HB772

AN ACT relating to pharmaceutical manufacturers.

CA AB2146

Product safety: recreational water safety: wearable personal flotation devices: infants and children.

LA SB39

Provides for the Louisiana Board of Drug and Device Distributors. (gov sig)

AL HB390

Alabama Drycleaning Response Trust Fund Board, requirement that the Alabama Department of Environmental Management prevent involvement of other units of government in contamination problems deleted; required minimum balance in Alabama Drycleaning Environmental Response Trust Fund reduced from one million to two hundred fifty thousand dollars.

AL SB321

Alabama Drycleaning Response Trust Fund Board, requirement that the Alabama Department of Environmental Management prevent involvement of other units of government in contamination problems deleted; required minimum balance in Alabama Drycleaning Environmental Response Trust Fund reduced from one million to two hundred fifty thousand dollars