US Federal House Bill HB179

US Federal 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/23
• Refer: 1/9/23

Caption

This bill requires the President to provide Congress and the public with certain information at least 30 days before issuing an executive order related to agriculture, food, and the livelihood of farmers, ranchers, and producers in the United States. Before issuing such an order, the President shall provide Congress and the public with (1) the executive order text, (2) a list of the federal laws affected, (3) information about how the President is working within the parameters of federal law and the Constitution, (4) information about how the executive order will be accomplished, and (5) a list of all the individuals and entities that the President engaged with before issuing the order.

Impact

If enacted, HB 179 would create a procedural requirement that could affect how executive orders related to agriculture and associated sectors are processed. The necessity for advance notice and detailed reporting aims to ensure that stakeholders, particularly those in agriculture, have a clearer understanding of upcoming changes that may impact their operations and livelihoods. This bill emphasizes the importance of legislative oversight and public involvement in government decision-making processes, particularly in the volatile field of agricultural policy.

Summary

House Bill 179, introduced in the House of Representatives, is designed to enhance accountability and transparency surrounding executive orders that pertain to agriculture, food, and the livelihoods of farmers, ranchers, and producers in the United States. The bill mandates that the President must inform Congress and the public at least 30 days prior to issuing any qualifying executive orders. This notification must include the text of the executive order, the federal laws affected, and details about engagement with relevant parties prior to the issuance of the order.

Contention

Notably, while the bill seeks to promote transparency, it may also generate discussions about the balance of power between the legislative and executive branches. Critics could argue that requiring such disclosures hampers the executive branch's ability to act swiftly and decisively in response to agricultural crises or emergencies. On the other hand, proponents may view it as a necessary check on executive power, ensuring that critical policies affecting agriculture are approached with due diligence and consideration for all stakeholders involved.