Us Congress House Bill HJR132

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/29/24
• Refer: 4/29/24

Caption

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Defense, the General Services Administration, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration relating to the "Federal Acquisition Regulation: Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects".

Impact

If enacted, HJR132 would effectively nullify the federal rule that advocates the use of PLAs. Proponents argue that this would lead to greater flexibility and cost-effectiveness in federal construction contracts by reducing the influence of unions and allowing for more competitive bidding processes. Critics, however, are concerned that this elimination could undermine labor standards and protections, potentially putting workers at a disadvantage by not ensuring collective bargaining agreements that PLAs typically provide.

Summary

HJR132 is a joint resolution presented in the House of Representatives that aims to disapprove a rule submitted by the Department of Defense, the General Services Administration, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration regarding the use of Project Labor Agreements (PLA) for federal construction projects. The resolution indicates Congress's formal disapproval of the existing regulation that mandates the requirement of PLAs in federal construction work. This legislative move is indicative of a broader debate surrounding federal acquisition regulations and the extent of federal control in labor relations on construction sites.

Contention

The key points of contention surrounding HJR132 hinge on the implications of removing PLAs from federal construction contracts. Supporters assert that the current regulations serve to inflate costs and limit competition among contractors, while opponents warn that abolishing the use of PLAs could degrade working conditions and labor standards in the construction industry. This resolution also reflects the broader political divide regarding labor relations and federal oversight, with significant implications for how federal projects are executed and managed.