Us Congress House Bill HJR165

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/5/24
• Refer: 6/5/24
• Report Pass: 6/13/24
• Engrossed: 7/23/24

Caption

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Education relating to "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance".

Impact

If enacted, HJR165 would effectively nullify the Department of Education's rule, thereby eliminating certain provisions that support gender equity in educational settings. Proponents argue that disapproving the rule is necessary to protect other interests and principles, while critics contend that it undermines critical protections for individuals facing discrimination, particularly in schools and institutions that benefit from federal funding. The disapproval could also have implications for federal funding to institutions that fail to meet expected standards of nondiscrimination.

Summary

HJR165 is a joint resolution that aims to disapprove a rule submitted by the Department of Education concerning nondiscrimination on the basis of sex in education programs or activities that receive federal financial assistance. This resolution was introduced to challenge the regulatory measures aimed at ensuring gender equality and protection against sex discrimination within educational institutions. The resolution was passed by the House of Representatives with a vote of 210 in favor and 205 against on July 11, 2024, indicating a closely divided stance among legislators regarding this issue.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HJR165 appears to be sharply divided along party lines. Supporters generally view the resolution as a necessary measure to limit federal intervention in educational settings, while opponents perceive it as a retrogressive step that could diminish protections against discrimination in education. The tense debate highlights the broader national conversation about gender rights and the role of government regulation in ensuring equity within educational environments.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential negative impact on students who may rely on federal protections against discrimination. Opponents of the resolution are particularly concerned that eliminating these protections could embolden discriminatory practices in schools, thus affecting student welfare and safety. This tension underscores the ongoing conflict between ensuring civil rights and addressing varying perspectives about the scope of government authority in regulating educational practices.