Relating to a national emergency declared by the President on May 11, 2004.
Impact
The termination of this national emergency could have significant implications for federal response mechanisms and funding allocations that arise under emergency declarations. Supporters of HJR79 argue that the resolution is necessary to uphold accountability in the executive branch and to limit the scope of unilateral actions taken by the President that may be viewed as overreaching. Critics, however, may warn that such actions could undermine existing frameworks that allow rapid responses to potentially urgent situations that affect national security or public safety.
Summary
HJR79 is a joint resolution aimed at terminating a national emergency declared by the President on May 11, 2004. This resolution was presented in the House of Representatives on July 6, 2023, by Mr. Gaetz and Mr. Gosar, and it intends to cancel the ongoing state of emergency as specified under the National Emergencies Act. The bill seeks to assert legislative authority over executive declarations of emergencies, thus reflecting a push for increased checks on presidential powers regarding national emergencies.
Contention
The discussion surrounding HJR79 includes notable contention over the balance of power between Congress and the executive branch. By pursuing this termination, proponents highlight a commitment to restoring legislative oversight, while opponents may suggest that removing the emergency status could hinder necessary government resources and interventions. The resolution further invites debate on what circumstances warrant a national emergency and who should ultimately hold the authority to declare and maintain such status.
Amending House Resolution 211 with respect to a national emergency declared by the President on February 1, 2025, and House Resolution 313 with respect to a national emergency declared by the President on April 2, 2025.