Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4366) making appropriations for military construction, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 9) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Lesser Prairie-Chicken; Threatened Status With Section 4(d) Rule for the Northern Distinct Population Segment and Endangered Status for the Southern Distinct Population Segment"; and providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 24) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status for Northern Long-Eared Bat".
The resolution also opens the floor for two joint resolutions aimed at disapproving certain rules put forth by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service regarding the status of the Lesser Prairie-Chicken and Northern Long-Eared Bat. If successful, these joint resolutions could prevent the implementation of protections intended for these species under endangered species provisions. The impact of this legislation is significant as it directly influences the ability of federal agencies to enforce conservation regulations, potentially altering their approach to protecting certain wildlife.
House Resolution 614 (HR614) pertains to the consideration of H.R. 4366, which makes appropriations for military construction, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024. The resolution outlines the structure for debate and amendment of the bill, allowing for a specified period of general debate, followed by the consideration of amendments to the bill under established rules. This process is designed to streamline further discussions in the House of Representatives while ensuring that all relevant points of order are waived, making it easier for members to engage in debate.
During the discussions around HR614, there are several notable points of contention. Critics argue that the fast-tracking of these appropriations and disapprovals may undermine essential environmental protections, while supporters claim that the resolution facilitates necessary funding to military and veterans' services without undue hindrance. The voting history reflects a close division, with the resolution passing with 216 in favor and 206 against, indicating a bifurcated perspective on how best to balance fiscal responsibility with environmental stewardship.