US Federal House Bill HR838

US Federal 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 11/2/23

Caption

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4821) making appropriations for the Department of the Interior, environment, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4820) making appropriations for the Departments of Transportation, and Housing and Urban Development, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024, and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6126) making emergency supplemental appropriations to respond to the attacks in Israel for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024, and for other purposes.

Impact

The resolution seeks to streamline the appropriations process by allowing these bills to be debated and amended in a relatively efficient manner. It allocates structured time for general debate, dividing it equally between proponents and opponents of the bills. By implementing these rules, the resolution aims to expedite the funding decision-making process essential for government operations and various programs administered by the mentioned departments.

Summary

House Resolution 838 provides guidelines for the consideration of several appropriations bills related to the federal budget for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024. Specifically, it outlines the procedures for H.R. 4821, which focuses on funding for the Department of the Interior, and H.R. 4820 concerning the Departments of Transportation and Housing and Urban Development. The resolution facilitates these considerations by waiving standard points of order against the bills, thereby simplifying the legislative process.

Contention

Debate around House Resolution 838 may focus on the implications of the waiving of points of order, as critics may argue that such practices undermine due legislative process by limiting opportunities for scrutiny and debate on critical funding measures. Supporters, however, contend that the urgency of appropriations, especially in light of emergency supplemental appropriations required for responses to global events, justifies these procedural adjustments.