A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, Department of Defense and the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Revised Definition of 'Waters of the United States'".
If passed, SJR7 would prevent the implementation of the revised definition of ‘Waters of the United States’, which could have significant implications for clean water regulations nationwide. Opponents of the revised rule argue that it expands federal jurisdiction over many water bodies and wetlands, while advocates claim it is necessary for protecting water resources. The resolution is indicative of the ongoing partisan debate over environmental regulations and federal versus state control regarding water management.
SJR7 is a joint resolution introduced to provide congressional disapproval of a new rule proposed by the Department of the Army, the Corps of Engineers, the Department of Defense, and the Environmental Protection Agency. This rule pertains to the 'Revised Definition of ‘Waters of the United States’', which was published in the Federal Register on January 18, 2023. The resolution seeks to nullify the rule, effectively stating that it should have no legislative force or effect if approved by Congress.
Notable points of contention surrounding SJR7 include the balance of power between federal regulations and state rights, as well as concerns about environmental protection versus economic development. Supporters of SJR7, primarily from Republican lawmakers, argue that regulatory overreach jeopardizes economic activities such as development and agriculture by imposing excessive federal oversight. In contrast, proponents of maintaining the revised definition assert that clear federal definitions are essential for preserving water quality and ensuring environmental stability.