Us Congress Senate Bill SJR85

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/15/24
• Refer: 5/15/24

Caption

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Marine Fisheries Service relating to "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Listing Endangered and Threatened Species and Designating Critical Habitat".

Impact

If enacted, SJR85 would nullify the rule that has been established by the National Marine Fisheries Service. The consequence of this resolution could result in the removal of critical habitat designations that have been put in place to protect various marine species. This action may fundamentally alter the protection mechanisms afforded to these species, impacting biodiversity and conservation efforts. Supporters of disapproving the rule might argue that it is overly restrictive and burdensome for industries reliant on marine resources, while opponents would highlight the potential loss of protections for vulnerable species.

Summary

SJR85 is a joint resolution introduced to provide congressional disapproval of a rule submitted by the National Marine Fisheries Service concerning the listing of endangered and threatened species and designating critical habitats. The resolution signifies Congress's intention to invalidate the specific rule that outlines how species are categorized regarding their threat status, which is crucial for conservation efforts. This congressional action falls under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, allowing legislators to disapprove agencies' rules deemed inappropriate or problematic.

Contention

The proposal of SJR85 has sparked debates among various stakeholders, particularly between environmental advocates and industries that utilize marine resources. Proponents of the resolution may emphasize economic benefits and reduced regulatory burdens, while opponents raise concerns about jeopardizing endangered species and the long-term health of marine ecosystems. The discussions are likely to reflect broader themes about the balance between conservation and economic interests, raising questions about the priorities of legislative actions concerning environmental protections.