Decoupling from Foreign Adversarial Battery Dependence ActThis bill prohibits the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from using appropriated funds to procure a battery produced by certain entities, particularly six specific companies owned and operated in China. This prohibition begins on October 1, 2027.The bill allows DHS to waive the prohibition if DHS assesses in the affirmative that (1) the batteries to be procured do not pose a risk to U.S. national security, data, or infrastructure; and (2) there is no available alternative to procure batteries that are of similar or better cost and quality and that are produced by an entity not specified in this bill.DHS may also waive the prohibition upon a determination that the batteries to be procured are for the sole purpose of research, evaluation, training, testing, or analysis.The bill requires DHS to notify Congress within 15 days after granting a waiver under this bill.The bill also requires DHS to report to Congress on the anticipated impacts associated with carrying out this bill, including with respect to specified agencies of DHS.
If enacted, HB 1166 would significantly impact procurement practices within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), mandating a shift away from certain foreign manufacturers. The bill stipulates that from October 1, 2027, funds appropriated for DHS cannot be used to procure batteries from specified entities. Such a shift could necessitate the development of alternative supply chains for critical energy storage and power solutions that DHS relies upon for operations. Furthermore, the Secretary of Homeland Security would be required to assess and report on the impacts of this procurement prohibition on various DHS components, potentially affecting services such as Customs and Border Protection and the Coast Guard.
House Bill 1166, titled the 'Decoupling from Foreign Adversarial Battery Dependence Act', aims to prohibit the Secretary of Homeland Security from procuring batteries manufactured by specific foreign companies identified as entities of concern. This bill was introduced in response to growing national security concerns over reliance on foreign-made batteries, particularly those produced by Chinese companies such as CATL and BYD. The legislation reflects a broader agenda to secure supply chains and mitigate risks associated with foreign adversaries potentially influencing U.S. infrastructure and security operations.
Debate surrounding HB 1166 centers on the balance between national security interests and the practicality of establishing domestic alternatives for battery procurement. Proponents argue that reducing reliance on potentially adversarial entities is essential for national security and protecting critical infrastructure. Critics, however, raise concerns over the feasibility of finding adequate substitutes that meet the necessary specifications and cost-effectiveness, suggesting that the bill may inadvertently lead to increased costs or delays in securing essential equipment for homeland security operations.
Foreign Trade and International Finance