Us Congress House Bill HJR61

Us Congress 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/25/25
• Refer: 2/25/25
• Engrossed: 3/6/25

Caption

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Rubber Tire Manufacturing".

Impact

If enacted, HJR61 would prevent the specified EPA rule from taking effect, which could have significant implications for air quality regulation related to the rubber tire manufacturing industry. This action may result in fewer regulatory requirements for manufacturers, potentially reducing operational costs but also raising concerns about the environmental consequences. The disapproval of stringent emissions standards could lead to increased pollution levels, affecting community health and environmental quality. The balance between economic interests and environmental protection stands at the forefront of this legislative discussion.

Summary

HJR61 is a joint resolution aimed at disapproving a rule put forth by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regarding National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants specific to rubber tire manufacturing. The resolution seeks to nullify these standards, which the bill contends may be excessive or burdensome for manufacturers. The legislative action reflects a broader trend of congressional efforts to exert control over regulatory measures formulated by federal agencies. By disapproving the EPA's rule, this bill aligns with the interests of various manufacturing sectors that advocate for lowering environmental compliance costs.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HJR61 appears to be largely favorable among legislators from industry-heavy states, who emphasize the importance of supporting American manufacturing by reducing regulatory hurdles. However, environmental advocacy groups and some legislators express strong opposition, arguing that loosening emission standards jeopardizes public health and environmental integrity. This divide reflects the ongoing clash between economic growth and environmental stewardship, highlighting the complexities and stakes involved in shaping federal regulatory policy.

Contention

A notable point of contention in HJR61 is the debate over the necessity and effectiveness of stronger emissions standards in protecting air quality against hazardous pollutants. Proponents argue that current regulations unduly hinder manufacturing operations, while opponents contend that such measures are essential for safeguarding environmental health. This discussion encompasses broader issues about the role of government oversight in regulating industrial emissions, illustrating how such legislative actions can prompt significant debates regarding agency authority and public welfare.