Keep Our Promise to America's Children and Teachers Act or the Keep Our PACT Act This bill provides funding through FY2035 for grant programs operated by local educational agencies to provide supplementary educational and related services to low-achieving students and other students who attend elementary and secondary schools with relatively high concentrations of students from low-income families. Additionally, the bill permanently reauthorizes the grant program to assist states and outlying areas in providing special education and related services to children with disabilities.The amounts provided by the bill are designated as an emergency requirement for the purposes of Pay-As-You-Go (PAYGO) rules and other budget enforcement procedures.
If enacted, SB343 would significantly influence state education laws by mandating increased federal appropriations for educational programs that serve disadvantaged students and those with disabilities. The proposed funding increases over the fiscal years, with a commitment to allocate more financial resources to ensure that schools can meet the needs of all students effectively. The bill emphasizes the responsibility of the federal government to uphold the funding commitments made in previous legislation, thereby directly enhancing educational outcomes for many students across the nation.
SB343, known as the Keep Our Promise to America’s Children and Teachers Act, seeks to ensure full funding of Part A of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. This bill is built on the premise that every child deserves a high-quality education, which is considered crucial for realizing their potential. The bill outlines the federal commitment to provide adequate funding that addresses inequities in educational resources across different districts, particularly targeting support for children with disabilities.
Debate over SB343 could arise from concerns regarding the federal government's role in education funding and whether mandated appropriations could strain federal budgets or affect allocations to other essential services. Opponents might argue that while the intent to support education is valid, how these funds are distributed and the accountability measures for schools must be addressed thoroughly. Supporters, however, would likely emphasize the necessity of such commitments to rectify longstanding inequities in education and ensure that promising educational practices are uniformly implemented.