Virginia Senate Bill SB764

Virginia 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/21/22
• Refer: 1/21/22
• Report Pass: 2/2/22
• Engrossed: 2/7/22
• Refer: 2/21/22
• Report Pass: 3/3/22
• Engrossed: 3/8/22
• Engrossed: 3/9/22
• Enrolled: 3/11/22
• Chaptered: 4/11/22
• Passed: 4/11/22

Caption

Public bodies; security of government databases and data communications, report.

Impact

The bill includes requirements for annual reporting on security audits, ensuring that agencies address identified vulnerabilities and implement the necessary corrective actions. Additionally, the Chief Information Officer (CIO) will be tasked with overseeing the security protocols and coordinating efforts across various state entities. This move is expected to enhance the reliability of government operations and protect the confidential data of Virginia’s citizens, which is particularly vital in maintaining public trust in government services.

Summary

SB764 aims to enhance the security of government databases and data communications by establishing comprehensive regulations for information technology across Virginia's executive, legislative, and judicial branches as well as independent agencies. The bill mandates that agencies adopt stringent policies and guidelines aimed at preventing unauthorized access and intrusions into sensitive electronic information. By emphasizing security audits and compliance with federal standards, the bill seeks to create a robust framework for safeguarding government data, which is increasingly crucial given the rising incidence of cyber threats.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB764 is generally positive among legislators who recognize the importance of data security, especially in light of recent breaches and cyberattacks on governmental entities. Proponents argue that the bill represents a proactive approach to cybersecurity, reflecting an acknowledgment that digital threats necessitate a comprehensive and collaborative response. However, there are concerns from some stakeholders regarding the implementation costs and the ongoing challenges of keeping up with rapidly evolving technology.

Contention

Discussion around the bill points to potential contention concerning the balance between security oversight and resource allocation among state agencies. There are worries that the additional compliance requirements could impose financial strains on smaller agencies or lead to bureaucratic complications. Legislative debates highlight the need for a clear framework that supports not only security objectives but also facilitates efficient operations without imposing excessive burdens on public bodies.