The implications of HCR4409 on state laws could be significant as it aims to reinforce the roles of both chambers of the legislature. By establishing a formal procedure for returning bills, it could change how legislative priorities are managed and how lawmakers engage with proposed laws. This resolution could lead to more intentional policymaking and reflection on legislative priorities, enabling representatives to better address the concerns of their constituents before final votes are cast.
Summary
HCR4409 is a resolution focused on the procedural aspect of legislation within the state assembly, specifically addressing the process of returning bills to their house of origin. This resolution signifies a critical step in the legislative process, ensuring that bills that have undergone revisions or need further consideration are reverted to the chamber where they were initially introduced. The intent is to promote thorough scrutiny and discussion before final passage, thus enhancing the democratic process of law-making.
Contention
While HCR4409 is primarily procedural, it is likely to stir some debate among legislators regarding the efficiency and practicality of returning bills to their house of origin. Proponents might argue that this resolution creates a safeguard for thorough legislative review, preventing rushed decisions. Conversely, critics may express concern that such a process could slow down legislative action and delay important policies from being enacted. The balance between ensuring thorough examination and maintaining legislative momentum will be a point of contention as this resolution moves through the legislative process.
Revised for 2nd Substitute: Providing gate money to incarcerated individuals at the department of corrections.Original: Providing gate money to individuals releasing from custody prior to the expiration of their sentence.
Revised for 2nd Substitute: Creating an option for impacted taxing districts to provide a portion of their new revenue to support any tax increment area proposed within their jurisdiction and clarifying that a tax increment area must be dissolved when all bond obligations are paid.Original: Creating an option for impacted taxing districts to provide a portion of their new revenue to support any tax increment area proposed within their jurisdiction.
Revised for 1st Substitute: Limiting a business and occupation tax deduction for financial institutions to fund affordable housing.Original: Eliminating a business and occupation tax deduction for financial institutions to fund affordable housing.