Outdoor advertising signs that do not conform to local ordinances and that are affected by certain transportation-related projects. (FE)
Impact
The proposed bill changes existing statutes by defining key terms such as 'reposition' and 'transfer' in the context of signage. Under current law, the realignment of nonconforming signs is specifically addressed, and the new bill expands upon this by removing strict limitations on where signs can be relocated. It enhances the previous framework by establishing clear protocols on how signs can be adjusted without jeopardizing their nonconforming status, which is crucial in maintaining compliance with local regulations amidst ongoing infrastructure projects.
Summary
Assembly Bill 486 aims to revise the standards governing outdoor advertising signs that do not conform to local ordinances and are affected by certain transportation-related public projects. The bill allows signs that were nonconforming when a state transportation project occurs to maintain that status under the local ordinance, provided that they are either repositioned within specific limits or transferred to another parcel agreed upon by the sign owner and the municipality. This change seeks to provide greater flexibility and protections for sign owners when public projects necessitate adjustments to existing advertising infrastructures.
Contention
A point of contention surrounding AB486 may arise from its implications for local control over signage. Critics might argue that relaxing the regulations governing outdoor advertising could undermine local governments' authority to enforce community standards. Supporters, however, contend that it provides necessary flexibility for business owners and promotes continuity amid changes due to state-funded projects. The potential for increased competition and economic benefit through the preservation of advertising spaces is also a central argument in favor of the bill.