Wisconsin Assembly Bill AB891

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/3/24
• Refer: 1/3/24
• Report Pass: 1/25/24
• Refer: 1/25/24
• Engrossed: 2/13/24
• Refer: 2/19/24
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

Academic and career planning services provided to pupils, requiring the reporting of certain data on college student costs and outcomes, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Impact

The implementation of AB891 is expected to enhance transparency regarding the costs and benefits associated with various degree programs. Starting from the 2025-26 school year, the data will be distributed to school boards, who are then required to provide this information to high school juniors and seniors. By informing students and their families about potential salary outcomes and associated debts from different programs, the bill aims to facilitate more informed decision-making regarding college education and career paths, ultimately improving educational and economic outcomes in Wisconsin.

Summary

Assembly Bill 891 introduces mandatory data reporting requirements for higher education institutions in Wisconsin, including the University of Wisconsin System, technical colleges, and specified private colleges. The bill mandates these institutions to annually collect and submit data relating to undergraduate programs, including average graduate salaries at 1, 5, and 10 years post-graduation, average student debt, graduation rates, and annual costs of attendance. This data will be compiled by the Higher Educational Aids Board (HEAB) and made accessible to the public and students as part of academic and career planning services.

Contention

While AB891 predominantly draws support from those who advocate for enhanced accountability in higher education, there are concerns regarding potential administrative burdens on institutions. Critics argue that the regulations might create unnecessary complications or expenses for colleges, particularly smaller institutions, as they strive to meet the new reporting requirements. Furthermore, there may be apprehension about how the reported data could be utilized, especially around performance evaluations or funding allocations, which could inadvertently affect institutional reputations or student enrollments.