Third-party processing of applications for occupational therapists and occupational therapy assistants and granting rulemaking authority. (FE)
The bill significantly alters the application and licensure pathway, proposing a shift from direct state processing to a third-party handling model. Proponents argue this will reduce processing times and enhance efficiency, making it easier for qualified candidates to obtain their licenses. However, it raises concerns about the accountability and reliability of third-party entities in managing sensitive licensing procedures, as well as potential variations in the application of fees. By establishing new regulatory frameworks around the application process, the bill aims for improved access to occupational therapy services across the state.
Assembly Bill 90 aims to streamline the licensure process for occupational therapists and occupational therapy assistants in Wisconsin by allowing the Department of Safety and Professional Services to contract with a third-party entity to process applications. This entity will be responsible for assessing applicants' qualifications, collecting fees, and ensuring compliance with licensing requirements, while also determining any relevant criminal history. Once an applicant meets the criteria set by the third-party entity, the Occupational Therapy Affiliated Credentialing Board is obligated to issue the necessary licenses promptly.
Notably, there are points of contention regarding the potential impact of this bill on state control over licensure processes. Critics might view the delegation of this authority to a third-party as a relinquishment of state oversight, which could undermine the integrity and security of the licensing process. Moreover, the provision allowing the third-party entity to set their fees could result in increased costs for applicants if not carefully managed. The Joint Committee on Finance is granted oversight of any fee changes, which includes holding hearings, suggesting an element of legislative check that some stakeholders deem necessary to maintain public trust.
Importantly, the bill requires transparency through annual reporting by the third-party entity to the legislature, detailing the number of applications processed, fees collected, and other performance indicators. This is designed to maintain a level of oversight and accountability regarding how well the third-party entity fulfills its contractual obligations. Additionally, it includes provisions for a budget review if a surplus of fees is identified, providing a mechanism to potentially lower fees in the future.