Wisconsin Assembly Bill AB933

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/12/24
• Refer: 1/12/24
• Report Pass: 2/7/24
• Refer: 2/7/24
• Engrossed: 2/20/24
• Refer: 2/26/24
• Refer: 3/12/24
• Enrolled: 3/15/24
• Chaptered: 3/21/24
• Passed: 3/21/24

Caption

Transferring the angel investment tax credit. (FE)

Impact

The enactment of AB933 amends existing statutes, specifically section 238.15(3)(e), to streamline the process of transferring angel investment tax credits. This change aims to foster a more inviting environment for investors and entrepreneurs alike. By allowing the transfer of credits, it not only supports immediate cash flow for investors but also catalyzes additional funding for startups. The initial applicability clause indicates that these changes will be effective for credits approved as of the date of enactment, thereby signaling an immediate impact on the landscape of investment funding.

Summary

Assembly Bill 933 pertains to the transferability of the angel investment tax credit, allowing eligible individuals to sell or transfer their tax credits to others who are subject to certain taxes. The bill aims to enhance the accessibility and utility of these tax credits, which are designed to stimulate investment in startup businesses and emerging industries within Wisconsin. This alteration is considered a significant mechanism to bolster the local economy, encouraging more investments by providing flexibility for credit owners.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding Assembly Bill 933 is predominantly positive, particularly among investors and pro-business groups that advocate for increased financial support for startups. By enhancing the framework for utilizing angel investment tax credits, proponents argue that the bill lays down a robust pathway for economic growth. However, some skepticism remains regarding the potential bureaucratic processes involved in transfer notifications and the associated fees imposed by the investment fund managers.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns from some legislative members regarding the regulations surrounding the transfer process, particularly the requirement for prior authorization from the investment fund manager. Critics argue that this could result in additional restrictions that may hinder the bill's original intent of promoting ease of investment. Moreover, the implementation of a transfer fee of up to 5% of the credit amount has raised questions about equitable access to these benefits, especially for smaller investors.