West Virginia 2025 Regular Session

West Virginia House Bill HJR6

Introduced
2/13/25  

Caption

Require Governor to provide at least five days notice to all state legislators when calling a Special Session

Impact

The amendment proposes to modify section 19, article VI of the state constitution, which governs the convening of the Legislature by the governor. If passed, this change would require the governor to issue a proclamation calling for a special session at least five days in advance. This change aims to enhance transparency and allow legislators more time to prepare for special sessions, which could result in more thoughtful consideration of legislative matters. It represents a shift towards more structured communication between the executive and legislative branches of the state government.

Summary

HJR6, or House Joint Resolution 6, is a proposed amendment to the Constitution of the State of West Virginia, aimed at changing the process by which the governor may convene a special session of the Legislature. Currently, the governor can call a special session at any time deemed necessary for public safety or welfare, but HJR6 stipulates that the governor must provide at least five days' notice prior to the convening of the Legislature. The resolution seeks to ensure that legislators are adequately informed and can prepare for special sessions, potentially leading to more organized and effective legislative processes.

Sentiment

Support for HJR6 appears to stem from the desire for improved communication and predictability regarding legislative sessions. Proponents argue that the five-day notice requirement will foster greater legislative accountability and preparedness. However, potential opposition may arise over concerns about the governor's ability to respond quickly to urgent matters requiring legislative action. Overall, the sentiment surrounding the bill leans towards a more organized approach to governance, though it may also highlight tensions between the need for timely legislative action and structured procedural requirements.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HJR6 may include discussions on the necessity versus practicality of the proposed notice period. Critics might argue that in urgent situations, a five-day notice could hinder the governor's ability to respond swiftly to pressing issues. On the other hand, supporters would counter that such a rule would safeguard against last-minute legislative decisions made under pressure, thereby promoting a more thoughtful legislative process. Ultimately, these discussions underline the balance of power and communication between the branches of government.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA ACA2

Legislature: retirement.

CA SB699

Legislature: constitutional course.

MI HR0041

A resolution to direct the Clerk of the House of Representatives to only present to the Governor enrolled House bills finally passed by both houses of the One Hundred Third Legislature.

CA AB599

Legislative Modernization Working Group.

CA AB1

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

CA AB478

Legislature: Member training.

CA AB1577

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

AK SCR1

Art. Ii, Sec. 16, Const: Veto Recon