Natural gas: out-of-state sources: greenhouse gases.
The introduction of AB 2195 underscores California's proactive stance towards managing and assessing greenhouse gas emissions more comprehensively. By obliging the SARB to update its inventory of air pollution sources and emissions annually, the bill enhances transparency regarding the environmental impact of natural gas sourced from outside California. This, according to supporters, is a step toward higher accountability and better protection for public health and the environment, as it ensures that emissions data is current and accessible for use in policy making.
Assembly Bill 2195, introduced by Chau, amends Section 39607 of the Health and Safety Code in California and is primarily focused on the emissions of greenhouse gases associated with natural gas imported from out-of-state sources. The bill mandates the State Air Resources Board (SARB) to quantify and publish annual reports detailing the amount of greenhouse gas emissions resulting from both the uncombusted natural gas released to the atmosphere and emissions from natural gas flares linked to the production, processing, and training of this natural gas. This provision aims to enhance the oversight of emissions and align with the state's ongoing commitment to reducing greenhouse gas outputs.
Supporters of AB 2195 view it positively, emphasizing its necessity for environmental protection and alignment with California's goals of reducing climate change impacts. The sentiment among pro-environment advocates includes recognition of the need for increased data granularity regarding greenhouse gases stemming from external sources. Conversely, some industry representatives express concerns regarding the additional monitoring and reporting requirements, which they believe could lead to additional regulatory burdens on natural gas importation processes.
Key points of contention surrounding AB 2195 revolve around potential financial implications for natural gas importers and the feasible capabilities of the SARB to adequately track and verify emissions from out-of-state sources. Critics argue that while data on emissions is crucial, the costs associated with compliance and the feasibility of accurate tracking could pose challenges for industry parties involved. The ongoing dialogue around AB 2195 indicates a larger debate regarding balancing regulatory measures for environmental protection and the operational realities of energy supply chains.