California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB506

Introduced
2/13/19  
Introduced
2/13/19  
Refer
2/21/19  
Refer
2/21/19  
Report Pass
4/4/19  
Refer
4/9/19  
Refer
4/9/19  
Report Pass
4/11/19  
Refer
4/22/19  
Refer
4/22/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Engrossed
5/13/19  
Engrossed
5/13/19  
Refer
5/14/19  
Refer
5/14/19  
Refer
5/22/19  
Refer
5/22/19  
Report Pass
6/3/19  
Refer
6/3/19  
Refer
6/3/19  
Report Pass
6/18/19  
Report Pass
6/18/19  
Refer
6/18/19  
Refer
6/18/19  
Report Pass
6/27/19  
Report Pass
6/27/19  
Refer
6/27/19  
Refer
6/27/19  
Report Pass
7/10/19  
Report Pass
7/10/19  
Refer
7/10/19  
Refer
7/10/19  
Enrolled
9/12/19  
Enrolled
9/12/19  
Vetoed
10/12/19  

Caption

Long-term health facilities.

Impact

The legislative changes brought by AB 506 have significant implications for the licensure and regulation of long-term health care facilities in California. By adjusting definitions of violations, the bill enhances the enforcement capabilities of the State Department of Public Health, enabling swifter actions against facilities that endanger residents’ health and safety. The increase in civil penalties acts as both a deterrent to negligent practices and a mechanism for compensating victims or affected parties seeking justice for harm endured due to inadequate care.

Summary

Assembly Bill 506, introduced by Assembly Member Kalra, amends the Health and Safety Code concerning long-term health care facilities. The amendments redefine violation classifications, which are critical in ensuring compliance and safety in nursing homes. AB 506 redefines class AA violations to encompass instances where a facility’s actions are determined to be significant factors leading to a resident's death. The bill aims to strengthen accountability and delineates increased civil penalties that can be imposed for various violations to better protect residents and enforce compliance with health standards.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 506 appears to be largely supportive, particularly from advocates for patient safety and rights within the context of long-term care. Although the bill was passed without dissent in the Assembly and Senate, the sentiment reflects a recognition of the need for rigor in health care standards for vulnerable populations like the elderly and disabled. It is considered a vital step in the push for enhanced regulatory oversight in the healthcare system, despite occasional concerns regarding the burdens it might place on facilities attempting to comply with stringent regulations.

Contention

Despite its strong support, there are points of contention regarding the potential increase in operational costs for long-term care facilities due to higher penalties and the heightened scrutiny that might arise from rigorous enforcement of compliance standards. Some stakeholders have expressed concerns about the financial implications of these new regulations, fearing that they could adversely affect facility operations and limit access to care in the already strained long-term care sector. Nevertheless, proponents argue that the well-being of residents must take precedence over financial considerations, underscoring the bill's intention to prioritize patient health and safety.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB323

Long-term health facilities.

CA AB2245

Long-term health facilities.

CA AB1335

Sugar-sweetened beverages: safety warnings.

CA SB809

California Fair Employment and Housing Act: Fair Chance Act: conviction history.

CA SB596

Health facilities: administrative penalties.

CA AB112

State Government.

CA SB96

State Government.

CA AB1599

Peace officers: investigations of misconduct.