California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1713

Introduced
1/26/22  
Introduced
1/26/22  
Refer
2/3/22  
Report Pass
3/21/22  
Refer
3/22/22  
Report Pass
3/29/22  
Report Pass
3/29/22  
Refer
3/29/22  
Refer
3/29/22  
Report Pass
5/4/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Refer
5/26/22  
Refer
5/26/22  
Refer
6/1/22  
Report Pass
6/29/22  
Report Pass
6/29/22  

Caption

Vehicles: required stops: bicycles.

Impact

The bill aims to enhance traffic safety for both cyclists and motorists by clarifying the rules of the road concerning intersections. The amendments to the Vehicle Code would help reduce conflicts between vehicles and bicycles at stop sign-controlled intersections, particularly on two-lane roads. Furthermore, the bill mandates a report to the Legislature by the Commissioner of the California Highway Patrol by January 1, 2028, which will analyze the impact of these changes on traffic incidents involving bicycles, signifying a commitment to ongoing evaluation of roadway safety and cyclist involvement.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1713, introduced by Assembly Member Boerner Horvath, addresses the requirements for bicycles approaching intersections governed by stop signs. The bill stipulates that individuals aged 18 or older riding bicycles must yield the right-of-way to vehicles that have entered or are approaching the intersection, as well as to pedestrians. This law will enforce a clearer understanding of right-of-way in the context of bicycle traffic, which has been a point of contention among cyclists and motor vehicle operators. The bill also provides for the issuance of a warning citation for first-time infractions committed by individuals under the age of 18 when they fail to stop at a stop sign.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1713 appears mixed among different stakeholder groups. Proponents, including cycling advocates, see the bill as a necessary step for improving cyclist safety and promoting more responsible cycling behavior at intersections. Conversely, some critics argue that the modifications may inadvertently create confusion among motorists regarding the right-of-way, potentially endangering cyclists instead of protecting them. The debate encapsulates broader discussions about cycling infrastructure and the rights of road users.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns from both drivers and cyclists regarding the practical implications of the bill. While the requirement aims to better establish right-of-way for cyclists, questions arise about how effectively the bill can be enforced and whether it adequately addresses the underlying risks associated with cycling at intersections. Additionally, the bill's stipulation to not require reimbursement for local agencies that may incur costs from this new regulation has also sparked debate regarding fiscal responsibility and accountability.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB122

Vehicles: required stops: bicycles.

CA AB73

Vehicles: required stops: bicycles.

CA AB1826

Traffic violation fees.

CA SB493

Vehicles: right-turn violations.

CA SB1132

Vehicles: right turn violations.

CA AB2859

Traffic-actuated signals: bicycles.

CA AB1238

Pedestrian access.

CA AB550

Vehicles: Speed Safety System Pilot Program.