California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB73

Introduced
12/13/22  
Refer
3/9/23  
Introduced
12/13/22  
Introduced
12/13/22  
Refer
3/9/23  
Refer
3/13/23  
Report Pass
3/9/23  
Report Pass
4/25/23  
Refer
3/13/23  
Report Pass
4/25/23  
Report Pass
5/17/23  
Refer
4/25/23  
Engrossed
5/31/23  
Report Pass
5/17/23  
Refer
6/1/23  
Engrossed
5/31/23  
Refer
6/14/23  
Refer
6/1/23  

Caption

Vehicles: required stops: bicycles.

Impact

The alterations proposed by AB 73 aim to improve traffic flow at intersections, potentially reducing congestion and enhancing safety measures for both cyclists and motorists. The bill establishes that violators under 18 will receive a warning citation for their first offense, thus introducing provisions aimed at fostering responsible riding behavior among younger cyclists. Furthermore, the Commissioner of the California Highway Patrol is tasked with reporting the effects of these new right-of-way rules to the Legislature by a specified date, potentially paving the way for future legislative adjustments based on collected data.

Summary

Assembly Bill 73, introduced by Assembly Member Boerner Horvath, seeks to amend certain sections of the California Vehicle Code regarding the rules of the road for bicyclists at intersections. This legislation specifically targets individuals aged 18 and older riding bicycles on two-lane highways, altering the existing requirement that they come to a complete stop at designated stop signs. Under AB 73, riders will be mandated to yield the right-of-way to other vehicles and pedestrians upon encountering such stop signs, significantly shifting the precedence in right-of-way protocols for bicyclists, while preserving overall traffic safety standards.

Sentiment

General sentiment around AB 73 is mixed, drawing support from advocacy groups promoting bicycle safety and local traffic efficiency. Proponents argue that the bill will facilitate smoother interactions between vehicles and bicycles, thus potentially leading to fewer accidents at intersections controlled by stop signs. However, some stakeholders are concerned about the bill's implications, fearing that it may create confusion in right-of-way rules and reduce accountability among cyclists, particularly concerning safety.

Contention

Key points of contention regarding AB 73 revolve around the balance of safety for cyclists while ensuring the protection of other road users, particularly when approaching intersections. Opponents of the bill believe that altering the stopping requirement compromises cyclist safety, especially for younger riders who may not fully comprehend the nuances of yielding versus stopping at an intersection. Additionally, since the bill becomes operative in 2031 and requires no reimbursement to local agencies for mandated costs, it raises concerns about local budget implications and the adequacy of resources to implement these changes.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB122

Vehicles: required stops: bicycles.

CA AB1713

Vehicles: required stops: bicycles.

CA AB2744

Vehicles: pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicle safety.

CA AB1826

Traffic violation fees.

CA SB493

Vehicles: right-turn violations.

CA SB1132

Vehicles: right turn violations.

CA AB2859

Traffic-actuated signals: bicycles.

CA AB1238

Pedestrian access.