California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB228

Introduced
1/12/21  
Refer
1/28/21  
Report Pass
1/3/22  
Refer
1/4/22  
Report Pass
1/11/22  
Refer
1/11/22  
Report Pass
1/20/22  
Engrossed
1/31/22  
Refer
2/1/22  
Refer
5/4/22  
Refer
5/4/22  
Report Pass
6/1/22  
Refer
6/1/22  
Refer
6/1/22  
Report Pass
6/13/22  
Report Pass
6/13/22  
Enrolled
6/27/22  
Enrolled
6/27/22  
Chaptered
7/21/22  
Passed
7/21/22  

Caption

Firearms.

Impact

The impact of AB 228 on state laws includes an increase in regulatory compliance measures for firearm dealers across California. The Department of Justice will need to maintain rigorous inspection schedules and standards for auditing dealer records, which may lead to heightened scrutiny on dealer operations. The bill also outlines a fee structure; dealers may need to pay an annual fee, not exceeding $115, towards the costs associated with inspections unless exempt due to local compliance programs.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 228, also known as AB 228, amends Section 26720 of the California Penal Code regarding firearms. It establishes a requirement for the California Department of Justice to conduct inspections of firearm dealers at least once every three years, starting from January 1, 2024. The intent of this legislation is to enhance regulatory oversight of firearm retailers to ensure compliance with existing laws. Additionally, the bill allows for certain exemptions regarding inspection fees for dealers operating in jurisdictions with their inspection programs.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding AB 228 appears to be mixed among stakeholders. On one hand, supporters are likely to view this legislation as a proactive measure toward reducing illegal firearm sales and ensuring that dealers adhere strictly to state regulations. On the other hand, critics could argue that the bill imposes unnecessary burdens on legal firearm commerce and may be seen as an infringement on the rights of lawful dealers.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding AB 228 include potential opposition from firearms advocacy groups who may see this legislation as an overreach that complicates the regular operations of licensed dealers. The bill delineates inspection methodologies and dealer responsibilities, which may be challenged as too stringent. The exemption for dealers located in jurisdictions with their inspection programs might also spur debate regarding the efficiency and effectiveness of such local programs compared to state-wide standards.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB459

Public employee retirement systems: prohibited investments: retailers and wholesalers of banned weapons.

CA AB1572

Integrated waste management plans: source reduction and recycling element: review schedule.

CA AB815

Integrated waste management plans: source reduction and recycling element and household hazardous waste element: dual stream recycling programs.

CA AB3178

Integrated waste management plans: source reduction and recycling element: diversion requirements.

CA SB629

Wildfires: fire hazard severity zones: defensible space, vegetation management, and fuel modification enforcement.

CA AB1288

Cannabis: track and trace.

CA SB398

Cannabis licenses: cannabis licensing agreements: labor peace agreement license requirement: medical marijuana identification cards.

CA AB3275

Contractors: unlicensed work.