California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB1249

Introduced
2/17/22  
Introduced
2/17/22  
Refer
3/2/22  
Refer
3/2/22  
Refer
3/16/22  
Refer
3/16/22  
Refer
3/23/22  
Report Pass
5/3/22  
Report Pass
5/3/22  
Refer
5/4/22  
Refer
5/4/22  
Refer
5/11/22  
Refer
5/11/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  

Caption

Vehicle dealers: document processing charge.

Impact

The bill's impact on state laws relates to the increased cost imposed on vehicle purchasers, as the expansion of the document processing charge directly affects the amount that consumers will pay when acquiring a vehicle. By raising the potential fees, the bill could lead to increased revenue for vehicle dealers operating under the specified conditions. Additionally, the DMV's ability to charge a corresponding fee also reflects a shift in the way dealer compliance and obligations are managed. This change could lead to a more streamlined and regulated environment for vehicle sales in California, but might also raise concerns over consumer costs.

Summary

Senate Bill 1249, introduced by Senator Archuleta, amends Section 4456.5 of the Vehicle Code concerning vehicle dealers and the document processing charge. Under existing law, dealers could charge a maximum of $85 if they had a contractual agreement with the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) as a private industry partner, and $70 for all other dealers. The bill proposes to increase the maximum document processing charge to $175 for those dealers who are private industry partners, effective January 1, 2024. It also stipulates that the DMV shall impose a fee on dealers based on reasonable enforcement costs associated with dealer legal obligations tied to vehicle sales and leases.

Sentiment

General sentiment regarding SB 1249 appears to be cautious. Supporters of the increase in processing charges may argue that it aligns the fees with the actual costs incurred by dealers in processing vehicle transactions, facilitating a more efficient business model. However, there may also be dissent regarding the potential burden it places on consumers, especially in a market already fraught with various fees and costs associated with purchasing a vehicle. Critics might view the higher fees as excessive and a possible exploitation of consumers who are obligated to navigate the vehicle purchasing process.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between ensuring that dealers can cover their operational costs through reasonable fees and protecting consumer interests from rising costs associated with vehicle transactions. Stakeholders such as consumer advocacy groups may express concern that increasing processing charges disproportionately affects lower-income buyers who may already struggle with the overall cost of vehicle ownership. Moreover, the lack of specification on how the DMV's fee will be calculated may lead to uncertainties regarding long-term implications for both dealers and consumers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB791

Vehicle dealers: document processing charge.

CA AB2796

State highway routes: Route 241.

CA AB3163

Department of Motor Vehicles: private industry partners: electronic submission of documents.

CA AB2227

Motorcycles: hang tags.

CA AB2658

Secretary of the Government Operations Agency: working group: blockchain technology.

CA AB1045

Driver’s licenses: bone marrow and blood stem cell registry.

FL H0697

State Legal Tender and Bullion Depository

CA SB465

Property Assessed Clean Energy Program: wildfire safety improvements.