The financial structure for compensating grand jurors is also reformed under AB 78. Currently, grand jurors receive a fixed fee of $15 per day, but the bill proposes that this be adjusted to 70% of the county's median daily income. This change is designed to fairly compensate jurors and could encourage broader participation in grand jury service. Should the Commission on State Mandates identify any costs associated with these changes, the state will be responsible for reimbursing local governments according to existing statutes. Thus, the fiscal implications of this bill could resonate through local budgets as they adjust to the new fee structure.
Assembly Bill No. 78, introduced by Assembly Member Ward, proposes significant changes to the procedures regarding grand juries in California. It mandates that superior courts provide comprehensive demographic information about jurors, including gender, age, race or ethnicity, and residential ZIP code or supervisorial district. This information must be submitted to the Judicial Council annually and will also pertain to both prospective and impaneled jurors. The bill aims to enhance transparency and accountability in the grand jury selection process, moving towards a more representative juror composition that reflects the demographics of the local communities.
While the bill has garnered support aiming to improve representation within the judiciary, it may also face challenges concerning its implementation. Concerns include the potential for imposing additional burdens on local courts and the logistical complexities of gathering and reporting demographic data accurately. Critics may argue that while the intent is to promote diversity and transparency, the costs and administrative requirements could divert resources from other critical judicial functions. The dialogue surrounding these provisions could significantly shape the future handling of grand juries within California.