Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00974

Introduced
2/19/15  
Introduced
2/19/15  
Refer
2/19/15  
Refer
2/19/15  
Report Pass
3/13/15  
Report Pass
3/13/15  
Report Pass
4/6/15  
Refer
4/10/15  
Refer
4/10/15  
Report Pass
4/16/15  
Report Pass
4/16/15  
Refer
4/22/15  
Refer
4/22/15  
Report Pass
4/28/15  
Report Pass
4/28/15  
Report Pass
4/29/15  
Report Pass
4/29/15  
Engrossed
6/2/15  
Engrossed
6/2/15  
Report Pass
6/2/15  

Caption

An Act Implementing The Recommendations Of The Legislative Program Review And Investigations Committee Concerning The Use Of Drones.

Impact

The enactment of SB00974 significantly impacts state laws governing privacy and surveillance. By establishing a framework for law enforcement's use of drones, the bill aims to balance operational needs with citizens' rights to privacy. It specifies that UAV operations must have a warrant, consent, or meet certain exigent circumstances, thus reinforcing accountability in law enforcement practices. Additionally, regular reporting by law enforcement agencies on their UAV operations supports ongoing evaluation of the law's effects and safeguards against potential abuses.

Summary

SB00974 is an act implementing recommendations concerning the use of drones, specifically unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), aimed at regulating their operation, particularly by law enforcement agencies. The bill provides definitions pertinent to UAVs, sets forth guidelines for their operation, and outlines the conditions under which law enforcement may deploy UAVs. Moreover, it mandates reporting requirements for agencies using UAVs which seek to ensure transparency and assess the implications of their use in public and private spaces.

Sentiment

The general sentiment regarding SB00974 appears to be cautiously optimistic among supporters. Advocates appreciate the establishment of guidelines for drone operations as a positive step toward ensuring accountability and protecting citizens' privacy rights. However, some concerns exist about the potential for misuse of UAVs despite the regulations in place. Additionally, skepticism remains about whether the proposed measures can adequately address public privacy concerns and enforce compliance among state agencies.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding SB00974 lies in the balance between security and privacy. While supporters argue that regulations are necessary to prevent abuse and protect citizens, critics highlight the inherent risks of surveillance and potential overreach by law enforcement. The bill's detailed requirements for operational protocols are expected to mitigate these risks, yet debates persist about the effectiveness of such measures in practice, as well as the broader implications for civil liberties and community trust.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT HB05202

An Act Implementing The Recommendations Of The Connecticut Airport Authority.

CT HB05330

An Act Implementing The Recommendations Of The Department Of Transportation And Concerning Capital Projects, Notice Of Proposed Fair And Service Changes, The Connecticut Airport Authority, Automated Traffic Safety Enforcement, Road Safety Audits, Parking Authorities, A Shore Line East Report And The Submission Of Reports And Test Results Regarding Impaired Driving.

CT HB05313

An Act Reestablishing The Legislative Program Review And Investigations Committee.

CT SB00393

An Act Implementing The Treasurer's Recommendations Concerning Unclaimed Property.

CT SB00391

An Act Implementing The Recommendations Of The State Contracting Standards Board.

CT HB05047

An Act Implementing The Governor's Recommendations For General Government.

CT SB00251

An Act Concerning The Legislative Commissioners' Recommendations For Technical And Other Revisions To The Tax And Related Statutes.

CT HB05180

An Act Implementing The Recommendations Of The Department Of Education.

CT SB00396

An Act Implementing Task Force Recommendations For The Elderly Nutrition Program.

CT SB00355

An Act Implementing The Recommendations Of The Freedom Of Information Commission For Revisions To The Freedom Of Information Act.

Similar Bills

CA AB1732

Redevelopment: successor agencies: asset disposal: City of Manteca.

CA AB394

Public transportation providers.

CA AB2375

Theft: vehicle burglary: online database.

CA AB1100

Taxation: homeowners’ exemption and renters’ credit.

CA AB346

Redevelopment: housing successor: Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund.

CA SB248

Taxation: renters’ credit.

CA AB633

Partition of real property: Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act.

CA AB181

Taxation: renters’ credit.