Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05013 Latest Draft

Bill / Comm Sub Version Filed 04/08/2021

                             
 
LCO 2684  \\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2021HB-05013-R02-
HB.docx  
1 of 7 
  
General Assembly  Committee Bill No.  5013  
January Session, 2021  
LCO No. 2684 
 
 
Referred to Committee on INSURANCE AND REAL ESTATE 
 
 
Introduced by:  
(INS)  
 
 
 
AN ACT CONCERNING MA NDATED HEALTH INSURANCE BENEFIT 
REVIEW.  
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General 
Assembly convened: 
 
Section 1. Section 38a-21 of the general statutes is repealed and the 1 
following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective July 1, 2021): 2 
(a) As used in this section: 3 
(1) "Commissioner" means the Insurance Commissioner. 4 
(2) "Mandated health benefit" means [an existing statutory obligation 5 
of, or] proposed legislation that would require [,] an insurer, health care 6 
center, hospital service corporation, medical service corporation, 7 
fraternal benefit society or other entity that offers individual or group 8 
health insurance or a medical or health care benefits plan in this state to 9 
[: (A) Permit an insured or enrollee to obtain health care treatment or 10 
services from a particular type of health care provider; (B) offer or 11 
provide coverage for the screening, diagnosis or treatment of a 12 
particular disease or condition; or (C)] offer or provide coverage for a 13  Committee Bill No. 5013 
 
 
LCO 2684  {\\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2021HB-05013-
R02-HB.docx }   
2 of 7 
 
particular type of health care treatment or service, or for medical 14 
equipment, medical supplies or drugs used in connection with a health 15 
care treatment or service. ["Mandated health benefit" includes any 16 
proposed legislation to expand or repeal an existing statutory obligation 17 
relating to health insurance coverage or medical benefits.] 18 
(b) (1) There is established within the Insurance Department a health 19 
benefit review program for the review and evaluation of any mandated 20 
health benefit that is requested by the joint standing committee of the 21 
General Assembly having cognizance of matters relating to insurance. 22 
Such program shall be funded by the Insurance Fund established under 23 
section 38a-52a. The commissioner shall be authorized to make 24 
assessments in a manner consistent with the provisions of chapter 698 25 
for the costs of carrying out the requirements of this section. Such 26 
assessments shall be in addition to any other taxes, fees and moneys 27 
otherwise payable to the state. The commissioner shall deposit all 28 
payments made under this section with the State Treasurer. The moneys 29 
deposited shall be credited to the Insurance Fund and shall be accounted 30 
for as expenses recovered from insurance companies. Such moneys shall 31 
be expended by the commissioner to carry out the provisions of this 32 
section and section 2 of public act 09-179. 33 
(2) The commissioner [shall] may contract with The University of 34 
Connecticut Center for Public Health and Health Policy or an actuarial 35 
accounting firm to conduct any mandated health benefit review 36 
requested pursuant to subsection (c) of this section. The director of said 37 
center may engage the services of an actuary, quality improvement 38 
clearinghouse, health policy research organization or any other 39 
independent expert, and may engage or consult with any dean, faculty 40 
or other personnel said director deems appropriate within The 41 
University of Connecticut schools and colleges, including, but not 42 
limited to, The University of Connecticut (A) School of Business, (B) 43 
School of Dental Medicine, (C) School of Law, (D) School of Medicine, 44 
and (E) School of Pharmacy.  45 
[(c) Not later than August first of each year, the joint standing 46  Committee Bill No. 5013 
 
 
LCO 2684  {\\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2021HB-05013-
R02-HB.docx }   
3 of 7 
 
committee of the General Assembly having cognizance of matters 47 
relating to insurance shall submit to the commissioner a list of any 48 
mandated health benefits for which said committee is requesting a 49 
review. Not later than January first of the succeeding year, the 50 
commissioner shall submit a report, in accordance with section 11-4a, of 51 
the findings of such review and the information set forth in subsection 52 
(d) of this section. 53 
(d) The review report shall include at least the following, to the extent 54 
information is available: 55 
(1) The social impact of mandating the benefit, including:]  56 
(c) During a regular session of the General Assembly, the joint 57 
standing committee of the General Assembly having cognizance of 58 
matters relating to insurance may, upon a majority vote of its members, 59 
require the commissioner to conduct one review of not more than five 60 
mandated health benefits. The committee shall submit to the 61 
commissioner a list of the mandated health benefits to be reviewed. 62 
(d) Not later than January first of the first calendar year following a 63 
request for review made under subsection (c) of this section, the 64 
commissioner shall submit a mandated health benefit review report, in 65 
accordance with section 11-4a, to the joint standing committees of the 66 
General Assembly having cognizance of matters relating to insurance 67 
and public health. Such report shall include an evaluation of the quality 68 
and cost impacts of mandating the benefit, including: 69 
[(A)] (1) The extent to which the treatment, service or equipment, 70 
supplies or drugs, as applicable, is utilized by a significant portion of 71 
the population; 72 
[(B)] (2) The extent to which the treatment, service or equipment, 73 
supplies or drugs, as applicable, is currently available to the population, 74 
including, but not limited to, coverage under Medicare, or through 75 
public programs administered by charities, public schools, the 76 
Department of Public Health, municipal health departments or health 77  Committee Bill No. 5013 
 
 
LCO 2684  {\\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2021HB-05013-
R02-HB.docx }   
4 of 7 
 
districts or the Department of Social Services; 78 
[(C)] (3) The extent to which insurance coverage is already available 79 
for the treatment, service or equipment, supplies or drugs, as applicable; 80 
[(D) If the coverage is not generally available, the extent to which 81 
such lack of coverage results in persons being unable to obtain necessary 82 
health care treatment; 83 
(E) If the coverage is not generally available, the extent to which such 84 
lack of coverage results in unreasonable financial hardships on those 85 
persons needing treatment; 86 
(F) The level of public demand and the level of demand from 87 
providers for the treatment, service or equipment, supplies or drugs, as 88 
applicable; 89 
(G) The level of public demand and the level of demand from 90 
providers for insurance coverage for the treatment, service or 91 
equipment, supplies or drugs, as applicable; 92 
(H) The likelihood of achieving the objectives of meeting a consumer 93 
need as evidenced by the experience of other states; 94 
(I) The relevant findings of state agencies or other appropriate public 95 
organizations relating to the social impact of the mandated health 96 
benefit; 97 
(J) The alternatives to meeting the identified need, including, but not 98 
limited to, other treatments, methods or procedures; 99 
(K) Whether the benefit is a medical or a broader social need and 100 
whether it is consistent with the role of health insurance and the concept 101 
of managed care; 102 
(L) The potential social implications of the coverage with respect to 103 
the direct or specific creation of a comparable mandated benefit for 104 
similar diseases, illnesses or conditions; 105  Committee Bill No. 5013 
 
 
LCO 2684  {\\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2021HB-05013-
R02-HB.docx }   
5 of 7 
 
(M) The impact of the benefit on the availability of other benefits 106 
currently offered; 107 
(N) The impact of the benefit as it relates to employers shifting to self-108 
insured plans and the extent to which the benefit is currently being 109 
offered by employers with self-insured plans;] 110 
[(O)] (4) The impact of making the benefit applicable to the state 111 
employee health insurance or health benefits plan; [and] 112 
[(P)] (5) The extent to which credible scientific evidence published in 113 
peer-reviewed medical literature generally recognized by the relevant 114 
medical community determines the treatment, service or equipment, 115 
supplies or drugs, as applicable, to be safe and effective; [and] 116 
[(2) The financial impact of mandating the benefit, including:] 117 
[(A)] (6) The extent to which the mandated health benefit may 118 
increase or decrease the cost of the treatment, service or equipment, 119 
supplies or drugs, as applicable, over the next five years; 120 
[(B)] (7) The extent to which the mandated health benefit may 121 
increase the appropriate or inappropriate use of the treatment, service 122 
or equipment, supplies or drugs, as applicable, over the next five years; 123 
[(C)] (8) The extent to which the mandated health benefit may serve 124 
as an alternative for more expensive or less expensive treatment, service 125 
or equipment, supplies or drugs, as applicable; 126 
[(D)] (9) The methods that will be implemented to manage the 127 
utilization and costs of the mandated health benefit; 128 
[(E)] (10) The extent to which insurance coverage for the treatment, 129 
service or equipment, supplies or drugs, as applicable, may be 130 
reasonably expected to increase or decrease the insurance premiums 131 
and administrative expenses for policyholders; 132 
[(F)] (11) The extent to which the treatment, service or equipment, 133  Committee Bill No. 5013 
 
 
LCO 2684  {\\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2021HB-05013-
R02-HB.docx }   
6 of 7 
 
supplies or drugs, as applicable, is more or less expensive than an 134 
existing treatment, service or equipment, supplies or drugs, as 135 
applicable, that is determined to be equally safe and effective by credible 136 
scientific evidence published in peer-reviewed medical literature 137 
generally recognized by the relevant medical community; 138 
[(G)] (12) The impact of insurance coverage for the treatment, service 139 
or equipment, supplies or drugs, as applicable, on the total cost of health 140 
care, including potential benefits or savings to insurers and employers 141 
resulting from prevention or early detection of disease or illness related 142 
to such coverage; 143 
[(H)] (13) The impact of the mandated health care benefit on the cost 144 
of health care for small employers, as defined in section 38a-564, and for 145 
employers other than small employers; and 146 
[(I)] (14) The impact of the mandated health benefit on cost-shifting 147 
between private and public payors of health care coverage and on the 148 
overall cost of the health care delivery system in the state. 149 
(e) The joint standing committees of the General Assembly having 150 
cognizance of matters relating to insurance and public health shall 151 
conduct a joint informational hearing following their receipt of a 152 
mandated health benefit review report submitted by the commissioner 153 
pursuant to subsection (d) of this section. The commissioner shall attend 154 
and be available for questions from the members of the committees at 155 
such hearing. On and after January 1, 2022, the General Assembly shall 156 
not enact legislation to establish a mandated health benefit unless (1) 157 
such benefit has been the subject of a report and an informational 158 
hearing as provided in this section, or (2) upon a two-thirds vote of the 159 
members of the joint standing committee of the General Assembly 160 
having cognizance of matters relating to insurance.  161 
This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following 
sections: 
 
Section 1 July 1, 2021 38a-21  Committee Bill No. 5013 
 
 
LCO 2684  {\\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2021HB-05013-
R02-HB.docx }   
7 of 7 
 
 
INS Joint Favorable