Florida 2022 2022 Regular Session

Florida House Bill H0389 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 02/24/2022

                    This docum ent does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill sponsor or House of Representatives. 
STORAGE NAME: h0389d.COM 
DATE: 2/24/2022 
 
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS  
 
BILL #: CS/CS/HB 389    Money Services Businesses 
SPONSOR(S): State Administration & Technology Appropriations Subcommittee, Insurance & Banking 
Subcommittee, Zika 
TIED BILLS:   IDEN./SIM. BILLS: CS/CS/SB 1536 
 
REFERENCE 	ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or 
BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF 
1) Insurance & Banking Subcommittee 15 Y, 0 N, As CS Hinshelwood Luczynski 
2) State Administration & Technology 
Appropriations Subcommittee 
13 Y, 0 N, As CS Lee Topp 
3) Commerce Committee 	20 Y, 0 N Hinshelwood Hamon 
SUMMARY ANALYSIS 
The Office of Financial Regulation’s (OFR) Division of Consumer Finance licenses and regulates various aspects of 
the non-depository financial services industries, including money services businesses (MSBs) regulated under ch. 
560, F.S. MSB applicants must submit fingerprints to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) for a state 
criminal history background check, and the fingerprints must be submitted to the Federal Bureau of Investigation 
(FBI) for a federal criminal history background check. The OFR must review the results of the state and federal 
criminal history background checks and determine whether the applicant meets licensure requirements. 
 
Access to the FBI’s criminal history record information (CHRI) system is authorized for fingerprints pursuant to ch. 
560, F.S. However, in order to obtain CHRI for applicants to the recently created Financial Technology Sandbox, 
FDLE sent correspondence to the FBI’s Criminal Justice Information Law Unit (CJILU) to obtain an Originating 
Agency Identifier (ORI). The ORI validates legal authorization to obtain criminal justice information and identifies the 
specific agency requesting the information. CJILU responded to this request stating that the MSB licensing statute 
does not qualify for access to CHRI because the terms “responsible person” and “control of a money services 
business”, as used in that statute to specify persons who are required to submit fingerprints, are overly broad and, 
thus, do not sufficiently define the categories of people subject to the background check. The CJILU acknowledged 
that MSB fingerprinting was previously approved by the CJILU, and that the FBI will continue to honor fingerprints 
submitted for MSB licensure. However, the CJILU has placed MSB fingerprinting on a grace period of unspecified 
length in order to allow Florida to amend MSB fingerprinting statutes such that the statutes specifically identify the 
categories of licensees or employees falling within the purview of the statutes; CJILU will not allow fingerprinting of 
additional categories of applicants (i.e., those applying under the Financial Technology Sandbox) during this grace 
period.    
 
The bill creates the term “control person” and repeals the definitions of “officer” and “responsible person”. Some of 
the elements from these repealed definitions are made part of the “control person” definition. The bill inserts “control 
person” throughout ch. 560, F.S., in place of these repealed definitions as well as other positions within an MSB that 
are consolidated under the newly defined term “control person”. A person who meets the definition of “control 
person”, as defined in the bill, must submit fingerprints and be vetted by the OFR. The bill clarifies the OFR’s duties 
associated with fingerprinting control persons who are added to existing MSBs. The bill relocates the definition of 
“publicly traded” such that the definition applies to all current uses of the term “publicly traded” throughout the 
chapter regulating MSBs. 
 
The bill has no fiscal impact on the state, local governments, or the private sector. 
 
The bill provides an effective date of October 1, 2022.   STORAGE NAME: h0389d.COM 	PAGE: 2 
DATE: 2/24/2022 
  
FULL ANALYSIS 
I.  SUBSTANTIVE ANALYSIS 
 
A. EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGES: 
Background 
 
The Office of Financial Regulation (OFR) regulates banks, credit unions, other financial institutions, 
finance companies, and the securities industry.
1
 The Division of Consumer Finance within the OFR 
licenses and regulates various aspects of the non-depository financial services industries, including 
money services businesses (MSBs) regulated under ch. 560, F.S. An MSB is any person located in or 
doing business in this state, from this state, or into this state from locations outside this state or country 
who acts as the following:
2
 
 Payment instrument seller: A payment instrument seller sells, issues, provides, or delivers 
payment instruments.
3
 
 Foreign currency exchanger: A foreign currency exchanger exchanges, for compensation, 
currency
4
 of the United States or a foreign government to currency of another government.
5
 
 Check casher: A check casher sells, issues, provides, or delivers currency
6
 in exchange for 
payment instruments
7
 received, except travelers checks.
8
 
 Money transmitter: A money transmitter receives currency,
9
 monetary value,
10
 or payment 
instruments
11
 for the purpose of transmitting the same by any means, including transmission by 
wire, facsimile, electronic transfer, courier, the Internet, or through bill payment services or other 
businesses that facilitate such transfer within this country, or to or from this country.
12
 
 
An MSB may engage in deferred presentment transactions, commonly known as “payday loans”, by 
filing a declaration of intent to engage in deferred presentment transactions with the OFR.
13
 A money 
transmitter or payment instrument seller may engage in the activities authorized for check cashers and 
foreign currency exchangers without paying additional licensing fees.
14
 State and federally chartered 
depository institutions, such as banks and credit unions, are exempt from licensure as an MSB.
15
  
 
An applicant for an MSB license must submit the following to the OFR:
 
 
 An application;
16
 
 A nonrefundable application fee;
17
 
                                                
1
 S. 20.121(3)(a)2., F.S. 
2
 S. 560.103(22), F.S. 
3
 S. 560.103(30) and (34), F.S. The term “payment instrument” means a check, draft, warrant, money order, travelers 
check, electronic instrument, or other instrument, payment of money, or monetary value whether or not negotiable. The 
term does not include an instrument that is redeemable by the issuer in merchandise or service, a credit card voucher, or 
a letter of credit. S. 560.103(29), F.S. 
4
 The term “currency” means the coin and paper money of the United States or of any other country which is designated 
as legal tender and which circulates and is customarily used and accepted as a medium of exchange in the country of 
issuance. Currency includes United States silver certificates, United States notes, and Federal Reserve notes. Currency 
also includes official foreign bank notes that are customarily used and accepted as a medium of exchange in a foreign 
country. S. 560.103(11), F.S. 
5
 S. 560.103(17), F.S. 
6
 Definition of “currency”, supra note 4. 
7
 Definition of “payment instrument”, supra note 3. 
8
 S. 560.103(6) and (34), F.S. 
9
 Definition of “currency”, supra note 4. 
10
 The term “monetary value” means a medium of exchange, whether or not redeemable in currency. S. 560.103(21), F.S. 
11
 Definition of “payment instrument”, supra note 3. 
12
 S. 560.103(23), F.S. 
13
 S. 560.403, F.S. 
14
 S. 560.204(2), F.S. 
15
 S. 560.104, F.S. 
16
 S. 560.141(1)(a), F.S. 
17
 Ss. 560.141(1)(b) and 560.143, F.S.  STORAGE NAME: h0389d.COM 	PAGE: 3 
DATE: 2/24/2022 
  
 A copy of the applicant’s written anti-money laundering program required by federal law;
18
 and 
 Fingerprints for the following individuals:
19
 
o An officer, which is defined as an individual, other than a director, who participates in, or 
has authority to participate in, the major policymaking functions of an MSB, regardless 
of whether the individual has an official title or receives a salary or other 
compensation.
20
 
o A director. 
o A responsible person, which is defined as an individual who is employed by or affiliated 
with an MSB and who has principal active management authority over the business 
decisions, actions, and activities of the MSB in this state.
21
 In turn, “affiliated party” 
means a director, officer, responsible person, employee, or foreign affiliate of an MSB, 
or a person who has a controlling interest in an MSB.
22
 
o The compliance officer, which is defined as the individual in charge of overseeing, 
managing, and ensuring that an MSB is in compliance with all state and federal laws 
and rules relating to MSBs, as applicable, including all money laundering laws and 
rules.
23
 
o A controlling shareholder. 
o Any other person who has a controlling interest, meaning a person who:
24
 
 Possesses the power, directly or indirectly, to direct the management or policies 
of the MSB, whether through ownership, by contract, or otherwise; 
 Directly or indirectly may vote 25 percent or more of a class of a voting security 
or sell or direct the sale of 25 percent or more of a class of voting securities; or 
 In the case of a partnership, may receive upon dissolution or has contributed 25 
percent or more of the capital. 
 
Fingerprints are not required if the applicant is a publicly traded corporation.
25
 If fingerprints are 
required, the fingerprints must be submitted for live-scan processing.
26
 Live-scan is a device that 
electronically takes fingerprints and other information and uploads that information to the Florida 
Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) who, in turn, sends the fingerprints to the Federal Bureau of 
Investigation (FBI) for a fingerprint background check.
27
 The fingerprints may be submitted through a 
third-party vendor authorized by FDLE to provide live-scan fingerprinting.
28
 FDLE must conduct the 
state criminal history background check, and a federal criminal history background check must be 
conducted through the FBI.
29
 The costs of fingerprint processing, including the cost of retaining the 
fingerprints, must be borne by the person subject to the background check.
30
 The OFR must review the 
results of the state and federal criminal history background checks and determine whether the applicant 
meets licensure requirements.
31
 
 
An MSB license must be renewed every two years.
32
  
 
                                                
18
 S. 560.141(d), F.S. 
19
 Ss. 560.141(c) and 560.127, F.S.  
20
 S. 560.103(26), F.S. 
21
 S. 560.103(33), F.S. 
22
 S. 560.103(1), F.S. 
23
 S. 560.103(8), F.S. 
24
 S. 560.127, F.S. 
25
 S. 560.141(1)(c)6., F.S. 
26
 S. 560.141(1)(c), F.S.  
27
 Florida Live Scan, 
https://livescanflorida.com/#:~:text=LiveScan%20is%20a%20device%20that,for%20a%20fingerprint%20background%20c
heck. (last visited Jan. 25, 2022). 
28
 S. 560.141(1)(c)1., F.S. 
29
 S. 560.141(1)(c)2., F.S. 
30
 S. 560.141(1)(c)4., F.S. 
31
 S. 560.141(1)(c)5., F.S. 
32
 Ss. 560.141(2) and 560.142, F.S.  STORAGE NAME: h0389d.COM 	PAGE: 4 
DATE: 2/24/2022 
  
Once licensed, an MSB is required to report any change in the partners, officers, members, joint 
venturers, directors, controlling shareholders, or responsible persons.
33
 If such person does not have a 
controlling interest in the MSB, then the person must simply comply with fingerprint requirements and 
be vetted by the OFR.
34
 If any person, directly or indirectly or acting by or through one or more persons, 
proposes to purchase or acquire a controlling interest in an MSB, such person or group must submit a 
new application for licensure at least 30 days before such purchase or acquisition.
35
 Such a change of 
control application is not required where the person or group of persons has previously complied with 
applicable licensing provisions, provided that they are currently affiliated with the MSB, or where the 
person or group of persons is currently licensed with the OFR as an MSB.
36
 A change of control 
application must be accompanied by the payment of an initial licensing fee and a fee per branch or 
authorized vendor, up to a maximum of $20,000.
37
 
 
As previously mentioned, when fingerprinting is required, the fingerprints must be submitted to FDLE 
for a state and federal criminal history background check. The federal background check is conducted 
through the FBI’s criminal history record information (CHRI) system. Federal law Pub. L. 92-544 
authorizes the exchange of CHRI with officials of state and local governmental agencies for licensing 
and employment purposes.
38
 One of the primary purposes for enacting Pub. L. 92-544 was to establish 
a national policy with adequate sanctions and administrative safeguards regarding the dissemination of 
FBI’s CHRI to state and local governments for non-criminal justice licensing and employment 
purposes.
39
 The FBI, with the assistance of the United States Department of Justice, has determined 
the parameters of Pub. L. 92-544.
40
 The criteria for granting access to the FBI’s CHRI are as follows:  
a. The state’s statute requiring fingerprinting must exist as a result of a legislative enactment;  
b. It must require the fingerprinting of applicants who are to be subjected to a national criminal 
history background check;  
c. It must, expressly (“submit to the FBI”) or by implication (“submit for a national check”), 
authorize the use of FBI records for the screening of applicants;  
d. It must identify the specific category(ies) of licensees/employees falling within its purview, 
thereby avoiding over breadth;  
e. It must not be against public policy; and  
f. It may not authorize receipt of the CHRI by a private entity.  
 
Access to the FBI’s CHRI is authorized for fingerprints pursuant to ch. 560, F.S. However, in order to 
obtain CHRI for applicants to the recently created Financial Technology Sandbox under s. 559.952, 
F.S., created in the 2020 legislative session,
41
 FDLE sent correspondence to the FBI’s Criminal Justice 
Information Law Unit (CJILU) to obtain an Originating Agency Identifier (ORI). The ORI validates legal 
authorization to obtain criminal justice information and identifies the specific agency requesting the 
information. CJILU reviewed s. 559.952, F.S., which derives its fingerprinting authority from s. 560.141, 
F.S. CJILU responded to this request stating that s. 560.141, F.S., does not qualify for access to CHRI 
because the terms “responsible person” and “control of a money services business” as used in s. 
560.141, F.S., are overly broad and, thus, do not sufficiently define the categories of people subject to 
the background check.
42
 The CJILU acknowledged that MSB fingerprinting was previously approved by 
the CJILU and that the FBI will continue to honor fingerprints submitted for MSB licensure.
43
 However, 
the CJILU has placed MSB fingerprinting on a grace period of unspecified length in order to allow 
                                                
33
 S. 560.126(3), F.S. 
34
 S. 560.126(3)(b), F.S. 
35
 S. 560.126(3)(a), F.S.; r. 69v-560.201(3), F.A.C. 
36
 S. 560.126(3)(c), F.S.; r. 69v-560.201(6), F.A.C. 
37
 Ss. 560.126(3) and 560.143(1), F.S. 
38
 20 C.F.R. § 20.33. 
39
 Federal Bureau of Investigation, Testimony of Dennis Lormel Before the House Financial Services Committee (Mar. 06, 
2001), https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/news/testimony/fbis-perspective-on-criminal-history-record-information-checks-on-
individuals-conducting-insurance-business (last visited Jan. 25, 2022). 
40
 Email from Heather R. Postlethwait, FBI Office of the General Counsel, to Nathan Pate, Florida Department of Law 
Enforcement, RE: ORI Request - Florida Office of Financial Regulation (Mar. 22, 2021). 
41
 Ch. 2020-161, Laws of Fla. 
42
 Email from Heather R. Postlethwait, supra note 40. 
43
 Id.  STORAGE NAME: h0389d.COM 	PAGE: 5 
DATE: 2/24/2022 
  
Florida to amend MSB fingerprinting statutes such that the statutes specifically identify the categories 
of licensees or employees falling within the purview of the statutes; CJILU will not allow fingerprinting of 
additional categories of applicants (i.e., those applying under the Financial Technology Sandbox) 
during this grace period.
44
   
 
Effect of the Bill 
 
The bill creates the term “control person” and defines the term as any of the following: 
 A person who holds the title of president, chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief 
operations officer, chief legal officer, or compliance officer for an MSB. 
 A person who holds any of the officer positions named in the MSB’s governing documents. 
 A person who holds any position named by the MSB's liability insurance coverage for directors 
and officers, if the business has such coverage. 
 A director of the MSB's board of directors. 
 A person who directs the affairs of an MSB or who participates in, or has authority to participate 
in, the major policymaking functions of an MSB, regardless of whether the person has an 
official title or receives a salary or other compensation. 
 For an MSB that is a corporation, all shareholders that, directly or indirectly, own 25 percent or 
more or that have the power to vote 25 percent or more of a class of voting securities.  
 For an MSB that is a partnership, all general partners, and those limited or special partners that 
have contributed 25 percent or more or that have the right to receive upon dissolution 25 
percent or more of the partnership's capital. 
 For an MSB that is a limited liability company, all managers, and those members that have 
contributed 25 percent or more or that have the right to receive upon dissolution 25 percent or 
more of the limited liability company's capital. 
 
The bill repeals the definitions of “officer” and “responsible person”, and some of the elements from 
these repealed definitions are made part of the “control person” definition. The bill inserts “control 
person” throughout ch. 560, F.S., in place of these repealed definitions as well as other positions within 
an MSB that are consolidated under the newly defined term “control person”.  
 
A person who meets the definition of “control person”, as defined in the bill, must submit fingerprints 
and be vetted by the OFR. The bill clarifies the OFR’s duties associated with fingerprinting control 
persons who are added to existing MSBs. Upon the addition of a control person, the OFR must 
evaluate the added control person and ensure that such person has submitted fingerprints for 
processing. If the OFR determines that addition of the control person would cause the MSB to no 
longer meet the licensure requirements under ch. 560, F.S., the OFR may bring an administrative 
action to enforce the provisions of the chapter. 
 
The bill relocates the definition of “publicly traded” from within s. 560.141(1)(c)6., F.S., to the main 
definitions statute of ch. 560, F.S., such that the definition applies to all current uses of the term 
“publicly traded” throughout the chapter.  
 
The bill provides an effective date of October 1, 2022.  
 
B. SECTION DIRECTORY: 
Section 1. Amends s. 560.103, F.S., relating to definitions. 
 
Section 2. Amends s. 560.118, F.S., relating to reports. 
 
Section 3. Amends s. 560.123, F.S., relating to Florida Control of Money Laundering in Money 
Services Business Act. 
 
Section 4. Amends s. 560.126, F.S., required notice by licensee. 
                                                
44
 Id.  STORAGE NAME: h0389d.COM 	PAGE: 6 
DATE: 2/24/2022 
  
 
Section 5. Amends s. 560.141, F.S., relating to license application. 
 
Section 6 Reenacts s. 559.952, F.S., relating to Financial Technology Sandbox. 
 
Section 7. Reenacts s. 560.114, F.S., disciplinary actions; penalties. 
 
Section 8. Provides an effective date of October 1, 2022. 
II.  FISCAL ANALYSIS & ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT 
 
A. FISCAL IMPACT ON STATE GOVERNMENT: 
 
1. Revenues: 
None. 
 
2. Expenditures: 
None. 
 
B. FISCAL IMPACT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: 
 
1. Revenues: 
None. 
 
2. Expenditures: 
None. 
 
C. DIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT ON PRIVATE SECTOR: 
None. 
 
D. FISCAL COMMENTS: 
None. 
 
III.  COMMENTS 
 
A. CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES: 
 
 1. Applicability of Municipality/County Mandates Provision: 
Not applicable. The bill does not appear to affect county or municipal governments. 
 
 2. Other: 
None. 
 
B. RULE-MAKING AUTHORITY: 
The Financial Services Commission (commission)
45
 will need to amend rules to conform to changes 
made by the bill. 
 
C. DRAFTING ISSUES OR OTHER COMMENTS: 
                                                
45
 S. 657.028(6), F.S. The commission is composed of the Governor, Attorney General, Chief Financial Officer, and 
Commissioner of Agriculture. S. 20.121(3), F.S. The commission members are the OFR’s agency head for the purpose of 
rulemaking. S. 20.121(3)(c), F.S.  STORAGE NAME: h0389d.COM 	PAGE: 7 
DATE: 2/24/2022 
  
The changes proposed by the bill have not yet been reviewed by the FBI. Continued access to national 
criminal history record information for persons required to submit fingerprints pursuant to ch. 560, F.S., 
is reliant upon the FBI’s approval of the changes made by the bill.
46
  
 
IV.  AMENDMENTS/ COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE CHANGES 
On January 27, 2022, the Insurance & Banking Subcommittee considered a proposed committee substitute 
and reported the bill favorably as a committee substitute. The committee substitute differs from HB 389 in 
the following ways: 
 Amends definitions. 
 Removes provisions relating to permanent or temporary bars to licensure or suspension of a 
license. 
 Makes other technical and conforming changes. 
 
On February 15, 2022, the State Administration & Technology Appropriations Subcommittee considered 
one amendment, which was adopted, and reported the bill favorably as a committee substitute. The 
committee substitute: 
 Removes the fiscal impact of the bill by restoring current law relating to an application for change of 
control of a money services business.  
 Further clarifies the fingerprint provisions for money services businesses. 
 
The staff analysis has been updated to reflect the committee substitute as passed by the State 
Administration & Technology Appropriations Subcommittee. 
 
 
                                                
46
 Florida Department of Law Enforcement, Agency Analysis of 2022 Senate Bill 1536 (Jan. 10, 2022).