Georgia 2023-2024 Regular Session

Georgia Senate Bill SB366

Introduced
1/22/24  
Refer
1/23/24  
Introduced
1/22/24  
Report Pass
1/25/24  
Refer
1/23/24  
Engrossed
1/30/24  
Report Pass
1/25/24  
Report Pass
3/13/24  
Engrossed
1/30/24  
Enrolled
4/2/24  
Report Pass
3/13/24  
Chaptered
4/22/24  
Enrolled
4/2/24  
Chaptered
4/22/24  

Caption

"Tax Expenditures Transparency Act of 2024"; enact

Impact

If enacted, SB366 will significantly modify Title 28 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, particularly regarding the legislative review process of taxation and appropriations bills. The bill mandates that the Governor's budget report must be distributed to every member of the House and Senate, and includes provisions for annual meetings where economic analyses can be discussed. By formally incorporating these reviews into the legislative calendar, the bill is likely to lead to more calculated fiscal policy and could curb unnecessary expenditures.

Summary

Senate Bill 366, known as the 'Tax Expenditures Transparency Act of 2024', aims to enhance the accountability and transparency of tax expenditures in Georgia. The bill introduces requirements for annual economic analyses of state tax credits, deductions, and exemptions, fostering a more informed legislative process regarding appropriations. This will allow lawmakers to better assess the financial implications of these tax measures and their impact on state revenue, aligning budgetary decisions with economic realities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB366 appears largely positive among supporters who emphasize the importance of transparency and fiscal prudence in government spending. Advocates argue that by scrutinizing tax expenditures more rigorously, the state can enhance its financial health and ensure that public funds are utilized effectively. However, some critics may view increased oversight as potentially cumbersome, possibly slowing down the legislative process or creating conflict over budget priorities.

Contention

Notable points of contention arise from potential disagreements regarding which tax expenditures warrant review and the adequacy of the resources allocated to conduct these analyses. Additionally, differing opinions on the implications of potentially modifying or eliminating certain tax breaks could spark debate about the economic impacts on various industries and constituencies. The balance between fiscal responsibility and the need to support local economies through tax incentives remains a pervasive concern among lawmakers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MI HB4870

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

MI HB4326

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

CA SB602

Advisory bodies.

CA SB1048

Advisory bodies.

CA AB3239

Advisory bodies.

KS HR6003

Providing temporary rules of the House of Representatives for the 2023 session until permanent rules are adopted.

MN HC1

A house concurrent resolution relating to the regent nomination joint committee.

AZ HB2443

Campaign finance; contributions limits