Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

Hawaii House Bill HB376

Introduced
1/25/21  
Refer
1/27/21  
Report Pass
2/12/21  

Caption

Relating To Procurement.

Impact

The implementation of HB 376 is expected to streamline procurement processes within various state agencies, potentially expediting project timelines by allowing for more options when selecting contractors. It modifies Section 103D-302 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes to encompass rules regarding bid evaluation and award notifications, thereby refining the structure around public bidding. Under the amended provisions, procurement officials are authorized to negotiate bid adjustments if bids surpass available funds, which adds a layer of pragmatism to the procurement framework and could positively impact project completion rates and fiscal management.

Summary

House Bill 376 pertains to the procurement process in the state of Hawaii, specifically amending existing laws in the context of competitive sealed bidding. This bill introduces the provision that allows purchasing agencies to award contracts not only to the lowest responsible and responsive bidder but also to the second lowest bidder in certain circumstances. This amendment aims to provide greater flexibility for procurement officials to ensure that contracts can be awarded efficiently and in alignment with available funding, especially in cases where the lowest bid exceeds the budgeted amounts. The law intends to enhance the state's procurement capabilities while maintaining transparency and fairness in the bidding process.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding HB 376 appears to be generally supportive among legislators focused on improving the efficiency of state procurement processes. The bill was passed unanimously in the House Government Reform Committee, indicating a consensus on the need for adaptability in procurement practices amid fluctuating financial circumstances. However, there may be concerns regarding the criteria for evaluating the second lowest bids, as stakeholders may want to ensure that quality and cost-effectiveness are not compromised in the pursuit of expediency.

Contention

While HB 376 aims for greater flexibility, potential contention may arise regarding the interpretation and application of the provisions regarding second lowest bids. Stakeholders worried about the implications for quality and scrutiny in the bidding process may question whether allowing contracts to be awarded outside of the lowest bid could lead to compromises in the integrity of projects. There is also the concern that without stringent evaluation criteria, subjective decisions could lead to perceptions of favoritism. Hence, the discussions surrounding this bill also highlighted the balance between efficient procurement and safeguarding the principles of transparency and accountability.

Companion Bills

HI SB658

Same As Relating To Procurement.

Previously Filed As

HI SB539

Relating To Procurement.

HI SB902

Relating To Procurement.

HI SB539

Relating To Procurement.

HI SB2942

Relating To Procurement.

HI SB84

Relating To Procurement.

HI HB18

Relating To Procurement.

HI HB1558

Relating To Procurement.

HI HB18

Relating To Procurement.

Similar Bills

CA AB422

State Seal of Civic Engagement.

CA AB574

Potable reuse.

CA AB292

Recycled water: raw water and groundwater augmentation.

MI HB5673

Administrative procedure: other; cross-reference to administrative procedures act within the natural resources and environmental protection act; update. Amends sec. 20120a of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.20120a). TIE BAR WITH: HB 5674'24

CA SB1033

Health care coverage: utilization review criteria.

MI HB4824

Administrative procedure: other; cross-reference to administrative procedures act within the natural resources and environmental protection act; update. Amends sec. 20120a of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.20120a). TIE BAR WITH: HB 4826'23

CA SB999

Health coverage: mental health and substance use disorders.

CA AB662

State Fire Marshal and Emergency Medical Services Authority: peer-to-peer suicide prevention.