Louisiana Senate Bill SB351

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 5/1/12
• Engrossed: 5/7/12
• Refer: 5/8/12
• Refer: 5/21/12
• Refer: 5/22/12
• Report Pass: 5/29/12
• Enrolled: 6/4/12
• Vetoed: 6/4/12

Caption

Authorizes the parishes of Calcasieu, Jefferson, and Orleans to establish an automobile rental tax district and to levy an automobile rental tax not to exceed three percent beginning July 1, 2012. (gov sig) (RE2 +$3,800,000 LF RV See Note)

Impact

The impact of SB 351 includes a new revenue stream for local governments in the specified parishes. The collected taxes will be allocated to various local initiatives, such as arts and recreation in Jefferson Parish and maintenance funds for the Lake Charles Regional Airport in Calcasieu Parish. This financial support can enhance community facilities and provide better resources for residents, contributing to overall local economic development. Furthermore, it establishes a framework for other parishes in the state to consider similar measures if successful.

Summary

Senate Bill 351 authorizes the parishes of Calcasieu, Jefferson, and Orleans in Louisiana to establish an automobile rental tax district. This bill allows these parishes to levy a local tax not exceeding three percent on the gross proceeds from the rental of automobiles. The tax will be implemented only after approval by a majority of registered voters in the district, making it a measure that involves local governance and public input. This tax aims to generate additional revenue for the parishes, particularly for cultural and community projects.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 351 seems largely supportive among local government officials and cultural advocates who see it as a vital tool for raising funds for community projects. The process of obtaining voter approval might create some contention, as it requires engagement with the electorate and could lead to debates over the necessity and fairness of such a tax. However, those in favor argue that the potential benefits to local arts and senior services outweigh the costs associated with the tax implementation.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise concerning the tax's potential impact on consumers, as some might view it as an undesired additional cost. There could also be discussions regarding the equitable distribution of funds across different areas within the parishes, especially in terms of prioritizing certain projects over others. Overall, while the bill aims to foster community enhancement and economic growth through tax revenue, it necessitates careful consideration of its implications and public perception.