Authorizes the New Orleans Aviation Board to use the construction manager at risk method. (8/1/13)
The enactment of SB 65 introduces significant changes to how public works contracts are awarded and managed in Louisiana, particularly for aviation projects under the jurisdiction of the New Orleans Aviation Board. The bill enables the board to make a case for using the construction management at risk method over traditional approaches, providing potential benefits such as cost savings, improved timelines, and better risk management. By having a well-defined process for selecting construction managers, the board anticipates enhanced outcomes for projects within its operational scope.
Senate Bill 65, authored by Senator Murray, authorizes the New Orleans Aviation Board to utilize the construction management at risk method for public works contracts, specifically for the initial construction of an airport terminal and related facilities. This bill allows the board to opt for a construction method that provides flexibility and control over the construction project, which can include engaging a construction manager who serves as the general contractor. The measure aims to enhance efficiency in executing large-scale construction projects while ensuring adherence to state regulations.
The general sentiment surrounding SB 65 appears to be supportive, particularly among those who recognize the potential efficiency gains in public construction projects. Stakeholders believe that the construction management at risk method can lead to improved project delivery and better resource allocation. However, there may be concerns regarding the oversight and transparency of the bidding process, as the method shifts some risk from the project owner to the contractor. The sentiment reflects a cautious optimism, balancing the need for innovation in public works with the accountability owed to taxpayers.
While most discussions appeared to favor the bill, there are notable points of contention related to ensuring competitive bidding practices and preventing any undue advantages during the proposal evaluations. Critics may argue that the introduction of this construction management method could lead to less transparency compared to conventional bidding methods, potentially inviting biases in how contracts are awarded. The capacity for public scrutiny and the integrity of the selection process will be crucial in addressing potential concerns as the bill is implemented.