Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB172

Introduced
4/2/15  
Refer
4/2/15  
Refer
4/2/15  
Refer
4/13/15  
Refer
4/13/15  
Report Pass
4/29/15  
Report Pass
4/29/15  
Engrossed
5/7/15  
Engrossed
5/7/15  
Refer
5/11/15  
Refer
5/11/15  
Report Pass
5/20/15  
Enrolled
6/8/15  
Enrolled
6/8/15  
Chaptered
6/29/15  
Chaptered
6/29/15  
Passed
6/29/15  

Caption

Provide with respect to the Transportation Network Company Motor Vehicle Responsibility Law. (See Act)

Impact

The bill will significantly impact the regulatory environment for transportation network companies in Louisiana. It mandates specific insurance coverage amounts, including not less than one million dollars for death and bodily injury during prearranged rides. Additionally, it imposes civil remedies for enforcement and penalties for violations, thus aiming to protect users and promote responsible operation among TNCs. The requirement is a proactive measure to address public safety concerns stemming from the rise of these services and the associated risks during their operation.

Summary

Senate Bill 172, known as the Transportation Network Company Motor Vehicle Responsibility Law, seeks to establish a clear regulatory framework for transportation network companies (TNCs) operating in Louisiana. The bill outlines comprehensive insurance requirements for drivers and TNCs, ensuring that adequate coverage is maintained during both prearranged rides and the period when drivers are available for requests. This legislation responds to the growing public interest in TNCs and aims to enhance safety and accountability for transportation services across state lines.

Sentiment

Overall, sentiment around SB 172 appears to be positive among legislators who view this as a necessary step towards regulating a rapidly expanding sector. Supporters believe that creating a structured regulatory framework will improve public safety and ensure that both drivers and riders have adequate protection. However, there may be some contention regarding the balance of regulation, as some TNC advocates may argue that excessive regulation could impede the operational flexibility that is a hallmark of ride-sharing services.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill may arise from discussions on how stringent the insurance requirements should be and how they might affect the availability and affordability of TNC services. Critics of overly strict regulations worry that high insurance mandates could deter drivers from participating in ride-sharing, thus limiting consumer choices and increasing costs. Additionally, defining liabilities and responsibilities between TNCs and their drivers introduces complexities that will require ongoing public and legislative input to ensure a fair balance between protection and service accessibility.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX HB1733

Relating to automobile liability insurance for transportation network company drivers.

CT HB05523

An Act Concerning Insurance Requirements For Transportation Network Companies.

TX HB2039

Relating to automobile liability insurance for digital network company drivers.

CT HB07126

An Act Regulating Transportation Network Companies And Taxicabs.

TX SB2319

Relating to automobile liability insurance requirements for transportation network company drivers.

TX HB3520

Relating to automobile liability insurance requirements for transportation network company drivers.

LA HB129

Provides relative to Medicaid nonemergency transportation providers and services (OR INCREASE GF EX See Note)

LA SB179

Provides for automobile insurance coverage for transportation network drivers. (8/1/21) (EN NO IMPACT See Note)