Louisiana Senate Bill SB70

Louisiana 2020 2nd Special Session

• Introduced: 10/6/20
• Refer: 10/6/20
• Report Pass: 10/7/20
• Engrossed: 10/13/20
• Report Pass: 10/14/20

Caption

Provides for legislative approval of BESE adopted adjustments to the MFP formula by ballot when the legislature is not in session. (See CA3s19) (Item #4)

Impact

The implementation of SB 70 significantly changes how adjustments to educational funding can be made during emergencies. By allowing BESE to act swiftly when necessary, the bill supports the adaptable funding of public schools in response to urgent needs, such as those arising from natural disasters. It streamlines the process for legislative approval that previously may have required convening a special session of the legislature, thus providing timely support for school systems that are affected by shifts in funding needs during crises.

Summary

Senate Bill 70, proposed by Senator Jackson, establishes a procedure for legislative approval of adjustments to the Minimum Foundation Program (MFP) formula used to fund public education in Louisiana. This law is particularly relevant in times of declared emergencies or disasters when the legislature is not in session. Under this bill, the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE) can adopt adjustments to the MFP formula, which are then presented to the Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget (JLCB) for public comment but not for a vote. After a five-day period, the adjustments are submitted to the entire legislature for a majority approval via a uniform ballot, ensuring that all members can participate in the decision-making process even when not physically in session.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 70 reflects a recognition of the need for flexibility in educational funding in the face of emergencies. Supporters, including many education advocates and legislators, view the bill as a proactive approach to ensure that school systems can swiftly adapt to changing circumstances. Conversely, there may be concerns from some political factions about the potential for this expedited process to diminish transparency and oversight, although the public comment requirement serves to mitigate these issues. Overall, sentiments appear largely favorable, emphasizing the importance of maintaining educational funding stability during times of crisis.

Contention

One notable point of contention is the balance between quick legislative action and the need for comprehensive oversight. While the bill facilitates a faster approval process for necessary funding adjustments, critics may argue it could circumvent more traditional methods of oversight that ensure thorough scrutiny of amendments to the MFP formula. The requirement for JLCB to receive public comments mitigates some concerns by ensuring that community input is considered, yet the lack of a formal vote during this step leaves room for debate regarding accountability in decision-making during emergencies. The efficacy of the measures taken under this bill will likely be evaluated in future sessions, particularly in the context of its implementation during actual disaster responses.