(Constitutional Amendment) Provides relative to the mandatory retirement age for judges
Impact
The removal of the mandatory retirement age is expected to have a substantial impact on the judiciary in Louisiana. Proponents of the bill argue that this amendment could lead to a more experienced judiciary, as judges could continue serving if they are deemed competent and capable. This could enhance the stability and continuity of the judicial system in the state. However, there is concern that allowing judges to serve indefinitely may hinder opportunities for younger judges and that it may be difficult to assess the competency of judges who age beyond typical retirement age.
Summary
House Bill 22 proposes a significant change to the retirement regulations for judges in Louisiana by eliminating the mandatory retirement age of 70 years. Under current law, judges must retire upon turning 70, although they are allowed to complete their current term. The proposed amendment seeks to repeal this requirement, enabling judges to serve beyond this age limit if elected by voters. This change is set to be decided by voters in a statewide election scheduled for November 3, 2020, which is an essential aspect of the legislative process for constitutional amendments.
Sentiment
Sentiment surrounding HB 22 appears mixed. Supporters, including some legislators, see the bill as a necessary modernization of judicial regulations that acknowledges the capabilities of experienced judges. Critics, on the other hand, express concerns that it could lead to a stagnation of fresh judicial perspectives and the potential for a judiciary that does not reflect new societal norms or changes. The debate highlights broader issues regarding age and competency in public office, and the balance between experience and the need for new leadership.
Contention
A notable point of contention in discussions about the bill is the notion of accountability and competency as judges age. Critics worry about the implications of extending judicial terms indefinitely, particularly regarding how the public can assess a judge's fitness for office as they age. Additionally, there are discussions about the potential impact on judicial elections, as the bill could ultimately change the dynamics of these races and the kinds of candidates that are considered viable by voters. The amendment essentially invites voters to consider not just the issue of age, but also the broader principles of judicial service in Louisiana.
Constitutional amendment to remove the mandatory retirement age for judges and to prohibit a mandatory retirement age for public office holders and public employment.
Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.
Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.