California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB836

Introduced
1/4/18  
Introduced
1/4/18  
Refer
1/16/18  
Refer
3/5/18  
Refer
3/5/18  
Report Pass
3/19/18  
Report Pass
3/19/18  
Refer
3/20/18  
Refer
3/20/18  
Refer
5/15/18  
Report Pass
5/25/18  
Report Pass
5/25/18  
Engrossed
5/29/18  
Engrossed
5/29/18  
Refer
6/4/18  
Refer
6/4/18  
Report Pass
6/12/18  
Report Pass
6/12/18  
Refer
6/12/18  
Refer
6/12/18  
Report Pass
8/16/18  
Report Pass
8/16/18  
Enrolled
8/30/18  
Vetoed
9/29/18  

Caption

State beaches: smoking ban.

Impact

The legislation requires the California Department of Parks and Recreation to place warning signs in designated areas to inform beachgoers of the new rules, which will only be enforced once these signs have been posted. Notably, the bill allows the Director of Parks and Recreation to identify certain areas within beaches that may be exempt from the smoking ban, taking into account public health and safety. Furthermore, it clarifies that there will be no state reimbursement for local jurisdictions regarding the enforcement of this new regulation as it creates or modifies existing infractions.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 836, introduced by Senator Glazer, aims to establish a smoking ban on state coastal beaches. The bill makes it an infraction to smoke or to dispose of used cigar or cigarette waste in these public spaces, with penalties of up to $25 for violators. Existing state law already restricts smoking near playgrounds, but SB836 extends this prohibition to the state's beaches, emphasizing public health and environmental quality concerns. The intention is to preserve these natural resources and ensure safe recreational areas for all residents and visitors.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB836 appears divided. Supporters advocate for the bill as a positive move toward protecting public spaces and promoting a healthier environment. They highlight the importance of reducing cigarette waste and minimizing smoking hazards on beaches frequented by families and tourists. Conversely, some opponents may express concerns about limitations on personal freedoms and the potential difficulty in enforcement. This point of contention reflects the ongoing debate regarding individual rights versus community health initiatives.

Contention

A significant aspect of the bill’s contentiousness lies in its potential implications for local autonomy over public health regulations. By establishing a state-mandated smoking ban, opponents might argue that it undermines local governments' abilities to tailor health initiatives according to their community's needs. Additionally, the provisions allowing exemptions may lead to discrepancies in enforcement, creating confusion among beachgoers and local authorities regarding the applicability of the ban in various areas.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB835

Parks: smoking ban.

CA SB8

State parks: state beaches: smoking ban.

CA AB1718

State parks: state beaches: smoking ban.

CA SB386

State beaches and parks: smoking ban.

CA AB1097

State beaches and parks: smoking ban.