Wisconsin Assembly Bill AB202

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/20/23
• Refer: 4/20/23
• Report Pass: 5/31/23
• Refer: 5/31/23
• Engrossed: 6/7/23
• Refer: 6/8/23
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

Investigations of conviction records by the Department of Safety and Professional Services for purposes of determining eligibility for credentials and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Impact

If enacted, AB202 would modify the existing legal framework regarding employment discrimination related to conviction records. Currently, the law permits DSPS to deny credentials solely based on substantially related past offenses. Under the proposed bill, DSPS would not need to review specific minor violations, potentially broadening the pool of applicants eligible for professional licenses. This legislative adjustment may lead to increased employment opportunities for individuals with previous convictions, thereby promoting rehabilitation and reintegration into the workforce.

Summary

Assembly Bill 202 addresses the procedures for investigating criminal conviction records by the Department of Safety and Professional Services (DSPS) with the aim of determining eligibility for professional credentials. The bill proposes changes to how DSPS evaluates the past convictions of license applicants, emphasizing the need to balance public safety with employment opportunities. It delineates specific offenses that may be disregarded during the evaluation process, such as minor, nonviolent convictions and certain DUI charges if they occurred more than five years prior to the application date.

Contention

There are notable points of contention surrounding AB202. Supporters argue that the bill is a vital step toward reducing barriers for individuals with past convictions, enhancing access to meaningful employment opportunities in various professions. Conversely, critics express concerns that the bill might undermine public safety by allowing individuals with potentially relevant criminal backgrounds to obtain occupational licenses without thorough scrutiny. This tension highlights the ongoing debate between promoting second chances and ensuring public safety in professional practices.