Maryland House Bill HB1107

Maryland 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/10/22
• Refer: 2/10/22
• Report Pass: 3/17/22
• Engrossed: 3/18/22
• Refer: 3/21/22

Caption

Maryland Sign Language Interpreters Act

Impact

The law has significant implications for individuals offering interpretation services as it introduces stringent requirements for licensure, thereby enhancing the professionalism and accountability within the field. Additionally, the act promotes access to communication for individuals who are Deaf or hard of hearing, which is an essential step for fostering inclusivity and awareness in public service and communication settings. The law also establishes a fund to support the Board and its mandated activities, which could improve the development and resources available for training upcoming interpreters.

Summary

House Bill 1107, known as the Maryland Sign Language Interpreters Act, was established to create a formal licensing and regulatory framework for sign language interpreters. This legislation mandates that individuals providing sign language interpretation services within the state must obtain a license from the newly created State Board of Sign Language Interpreters. The bill not only outlines the qualifications necessary for licensure but also emphasizes the importance of creating a structured environment for interpreting services that can operate uniformly across the state. The State Board will oversee the implementation of these standards and manage the licensing process, including setting fees and ensuring compliance with regulations.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB1107 appears to be supportive among advocates for the Deaf community and interpreting professionals. They view the establishment of licensure as a necessary advancement that will ensure high-quality services and protect the rights of recipients of sign language interpretation. However, there are concerns regarding the potential financial barriers that the licensing requirements could impose on new interpreters entering the profession.

Contention

Notable points of contention include discussions about accessibility and diversity in the interpreting profession, particularly concerning support for marginalized groups entering the field. Ensuring that the licensing process does not disproportionately affect those from disadvantaged backgrounds has been raised as an important consideration. Furthermore, the balance between regulatory enforcement and maintaining an adequately trained workforce has also been a critical issue debated among stakeholders who fear that over-regulation might limit access to services.