Texas House Bill HB3091

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Relating to the confidentiality of and prohibiting disclosure of the location or physical layout of a family violence shelter center or victims of trafficking shelter center; creating a criminal offense.

Impact

The bill is expected to have a significant impact on state laws regarding the disclosure of private information related to sensitive institutions. By establishing legal penalties for the unauthorized disclosure of this information, specifically a Class A misdemeanor for violations, the bill elevates the importance of protecting vulnerable populations. This change shifts the legal landscape, ensuring that governmental bodies must exercise caution and diligence in handling such sensitive data and thus strengthens the legal framework supporting shelter privacy rights.

Summary

House Bill 3091 focuses on enhancing the confidentiality and protection of family violence shelter centers and victims of trafficking shelter centers. It explicitly prohibits the disclosure of their locations or physical layouts. This protection is crucial as it aims to safeguard the residents of these shelters from potential threats and harm. By making such information confidential, the legislation seeks to provide a safer environment for individuals seeking refuge from violence or trafficking, highlighting the importance of privacy in these sensitive situations.

Sentiment

The legislative sentiment surrounding HB 3091 has been largely supportive, reflecting a consensus on the need for stronger protections for victims of family violence and human trafficking. Proponents express that this legislation is a critical step toward ensuring safety and confidentiality for survivors, enhancing the overall effectiveness of shelters in protecting those who seek their services. The unifying concern within the discussions indicates a strong commitment to the welfare of vulnerable individuals in the state.

Contention

Despite the strong support, some concerns were raised about the implications of increasing penalties for disclosure. Critics worried that the definition of 'disclosure' could be broadly interpreted, potentially leading to complications for journalists and community members seeking to report on shelters or assess their availability for those in need. Nevertheless, these concerns did not significantly impede the passage of the bill, as the prevailing view emphasized the urgent necessity of protecting individuals in vulnerable circumstances from harm and ensuring their privacy.