Maryland 2022 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB128

Introduced
1/12/22  
Refer
1/12/22  
Report Pass
3/1/22  
Engrossed
3/4/22  
Refer
3/7/22  
Report Pass
4/4/22  
Enrolled
4/7/22  

Caption

Debt Settlement Services – Student Education Loan Debt Relief – Disclosures and Prohibitions

Impact

The passage of HB 128 is expected to strengthen consumer protections in the realm of student loan debt settlement and management. By requiring clear disclosures and setting forth prohibitions against certain misleading practices, the bill aims to prevent consumers from making uninformed decisions when engaging with debt settlement providers. This change in state law could lead to more informed choices regarding debt management, thereby improving consumer confidence in the financial services industry and potentially reducing the risk of falling into further debt due to unregulated practices.

Summary

House Bill 128 focuses on enhancing regulatory oversight for debt settlement services that pertain specifically to student education loan debt relief. The bill mandates that providers of debt settlement services disclose critical information relating to their services, thereby ensuring transparency for consumers seeking assistance in managing their student loan debts. This includes providing clear terms, fees associated with the services, and mandatory disclaimers in advertisements that clarify the private nature of these companies versus government loan servicers. The enactment of this bill aims to protect consumers from potentially predatory practices in the market for student loan debt relief services.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB 128 appears to be supportive, particularly among consumer advocacy groups and lawmakers concerned about predatory lending practices. Supporters argue that the additional regulations are necessary to safeguard vulnerable borrowers from exploitation and to ensure that individuals seeking financial help are provided with accurate information and fair treatment. However, there may also be opposition from some service providers who view the increased regulations as an impediment to their operational freedom.

Contention

Notable points of contention related to HB 128 center on the balance between consumer protection and market freedom. While proponents advocate for stricter regulations to mitigate fraud and misrepresentation in debt relief services, opponents may argue that excessive regulation could stifle legitimate businesses from operating effectively. The legislation seeks to delineate the responsibilities of debt settlement providers while holding them accountable for their practices, fostering a more equitable environment for consumers navigating the complexities of student loan debt.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MD SB36

Family Law - Grounds for Divorce

MD HB14

Family Law - Grounds for Divorce

MD HB639

Family Law - Grounds for Divorce

MD HB1319

Family Law - Grounds for Divorce - Gender Transition

MD HB571

Opioids - Opioid Restitution Advisory Council and Fund and Overdose Response Program

MD SB954

Opioids - Opioid Restitution Advisory Council and Fund and Overdose Response Program

MD HB870

Tobacco Product Manufacturers - Escrow Act - Alterations

MD SB1018

Tobacco Product Manufacturers – Escrow Act – Alterations