Maryland 2022 Regular Session

Maryland Senate Bill SB231

Introduced
1/13/22  
Refer
1/13/22  
Report Pass
3/29/22  
Engrossed
3/29/22  
Refer
3/29/22  

Caption

Correctional Officers' Retirement System - Membership

Impact

The passage of SB231 is poised to positively impact state laws governing retirement benefits for correctional officers by expanding the definition of eligible members. By incorporating a broader scope of positions within the correctional and juvenile services, the bill aims to provide equitable treatment and recognition of the valuable contributions made by these individuals in managing and rehabilitating youth in the correctional system. It essentially allows members previously not considered for the retirement benefits enjoyed by correction officers to have equal access to such provisions.

Summary

Senate Bill 231 primarily alters the membership criteria for the Correctional Officers' Retirement System by including additional personnel serving within the Department of Juvenile Services. This bill aims to ensure that individuals in specific positions, such as community detention officers, youth transportation officers, and various supervisory roles within juvenile services, are afforded the same retirement benefits as traditional correctional officers. This inclusion recognizes the essential roles these individuals play in the state's correctional system, thereby enhancing their retirement security.

Sentiment

General sentiments surrounding SB231 appear to favor a broader inclusion of employees in the retirement benefits scheme. Supporters, particularly those within juvenile services, advocate for the recognition of the risks and demands associated with their roles, arguing that all those in correctional settings deserve fair compensation and retirement benefits irrespective of their specific job titles. However, there may be dissent among budget-conscious lawmakers concerned about the financial implications of expanding the retirement system to include additional positions.

Contention

While SB231 generally garners support, notable points of contention include the potential fiscal impact on the state's retirement system and its ability to sustain expanded benefits. Lawmakers may debate the long-term sustainability of the retirement fund, especially with the inclusion of more employees. Additionally, concerns may arise regarding the classification of roles within juvenile services and whether all positions truly require the same protections and benefits associated with traditional correctional officer roles.

Companion Bills

MD HB763

Crossfiled Correctional Officers’ Retirement System – Membership

Similar Bills

CA AB1758

Board of Behavioral Sciences: marriage and family therapists: clinical social workers: professional clinical counselors: supervision of applicants for licensure via videoconferencing.

CA SB1024

Healing arts: Board of Behavioral Sciences: licensees and registrants.

CA SB759

Elections: vote by mail ballots.

CA AB690

Marriage and family therapists: clinical social workers: professional clinical counselors.

CA AB2363

Marriage and family therapists: clinical social workers: professional clinical counselors.

CA AB1057

Oil and gas: Geologic Energy Management Division: wells and facilities: disposition and acquisition notices: indemnity bonds and remediation: additional security: civil penalty.

CA AB1167

Oil and gas: acquisition: bonding requirements.

CA AB1038

California Health Equity Program.