Maryland 2024 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB1297

Introduced
2/9/24  
Refer
2/9/24  
Report Pass
3/16/24  
Engrossed
3/18/24  

Caption

Education - Artificial Intelligence - Study and Regulations

Impact

The introduction of HB 1297 represents a significant shift in state education policies, particularly regarding technological advancements in teaching and learning. By requiring each county board to conduct an annual inventory of AI systems utilized within schools, the bill promotes a clear oversight mechanism. Additionally, it mandates that policies must be developed to safeguard against unlawful discrimination and protect the privacy of students, ensuring that any technological integration prioritizes educational equity and security.

Summary

House Bill 1297 focuses on the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into primary and secondary education systems in Maryland. The bill mandates the State Department of Education, in consultation with the Department of Information Technology, to develop guidelines and best practices on the responsible use of AI in education. It aims to foster an environment where AI can enhance educational experiences while ensuring that ethical considerations are at the forefront. The legislation also requires the establishment of a pilot program to explore the most effective uses of AI within schools and local educational bodies.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around HB 1297 is largely supportive, particularly among educators and technology advocates who see potential in using AI to improve learning outcomes and operational efficiencies in schools. However, there are concerns among privacy advocates regarding the implications of AI systems on student data and the potential for misuse. The sentiment reflects a cautious optimism that highlights the necessity for thoughtful regulation and ethical usage in this rapidly evolving field.

Contention

Notably, points of contention include the potential for ethical dilemmas regarding student data privacy and the fear of exacerbating inequalities in educational access. Critics argue that without strong safeguards and transparent practices, AI applications could lead to unintended negative consequences, including bias in educational assessments or data handling. Thus, the discussions surrounding HB 1297 not only emphasize the need for innovation in education but also spotlight critical conversations around ethics and governance in technology.

Companion Bills

MD SB979

Crossfiled Education - Artificial Intelligence - Guidelines and Pilot Program

Similar Bills

CA AB2652

State Department of Education: artificial intelligence working group.

CA SB1288

Public schools: artificial intelligence working group.

CA SB524

Law enforcement agencies: artificial intelligence.

NJ A4821

Requires OIT to develop NJ generative artificial intelligence program and implement artificial intelligence education courses with county governments; appropriates $1.5 million.

TX HB1709

Relating to the regulation and reporting on the use of artificial intelligence systems by certain business entities and state agencies; providing civil penalties.

CA AB594

Artificial intelligence.

CA SB813

Multistakeholder regulatory organizations.

HI SB487

Relating To A Statewide Data And Artificial Intelligence Governance And Decision Intelligence Center.