Maryland 2024 Regular Session

Maryland Senate Bill SB492

Introduced
1/24/24  
Refer
1/24/24  
Report Pass
4/2/24  
Engrossed
4/3/24  
Refer
4/3/24  

Caption

Public Schools - Student Telehealth Appointments - State Guidelines, Policies, and Access

Impact

The implementation of SB492 is expected to significantly influence public education and healthcare regulations in the state. By establishing guidelines that support telehealth access, the bill enhances the health resources available to students, potentially improving their overall well-being and academic performance. Each county board of education is required to align their local policies with state guidelines by adopting and implementing telehealth policies before the 2025-2026 school year, which fosters uniformity in health services across Maryland schools.

Summary

Senate Bill 492, titled 'Public Schools - Student Telehealth Appointments - State Guidelines, Policies, and Access,' mandates that all public middle and high schools in Maryland create policies to allow student participation in telehealth appointments during school hours. This initiative aims to ensure students have access to healthcare services without unnecessary barriers, accommodating their needs while maintaining a safe educational environment. The bill necessitates the designation of appropriate spaces within schools for conducting these appointments privately and securely.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB492 appears largelypositive among educational and health professionals, who recognize the need for better health resources for students. Supporters argue that this bill is a proactive step towards addressing mental health issues and providing students with the necessary support to manage health conditions without interrupting their education. However, there may be concerns regarding the adequacy of school resources and staff training to effectively implement these policies, indicating a need for further discussion and planning.

Contention

While SB492 has gained approval, discussions around its implementation may reveal points of contention. Some lawmakers and stakeholders might raise concerns about privacy during telehealth sessions, parental consent for appointments, and the adequacy of space designated for these services in existing school facilities. Additionally, the bill’s requirement for local education boards to develop new policies may put a strain on resources, leading to possible debates over funding and operational support for schools to effectively manage telehealth initiatives.

Companion Bills

MD HB522

Crossfiled Public Schools - Student Telehealth Appointments - State Guidelines, Policies, and Access

MD HB878

Carry Over Public Schools - Student Telehealth Appointments - Policy and Access

Similar Bills

CA AB688

Telehealth for All Act of 2025.

CA AB1982

Telehealth: dental care.

KY HB188

AN ACT relating to telehealth.

CA SB1278

Medicine: telehealth.

ME LD742

An Act to Permit Telehealth Services Across State Lines Following Referral from a Primary Care Provider Based in the State

CA AB457

Protection of Patient Choice in Telehealth Provider Act.

CA AB744

Health care coverage: telehealth.

HI HB384

Relating To Telehealth.