Minnesota 2023-2024 Regular Session

Minnesota House Bill HF2369

Introduced
3/2/23  
Refer
3/2/23  
Refer
3/13/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Report Pass
4/27/23  
Refer
4/27/23  
Report Pass
5/1/23  
Engrossed
5/19/23  
Refer
5/19/23  
Report Pass
5/20/23  
Enrolled
5/25/23  
Vetoed
5/25/23  
Vetoed
5/25/23  
Chaptered
5/25/23  

Caption

Transportation network company driver protections established, civil action provided, and criminal penalties provided.

Impact

If enacted, HF2369 will revise state laws relating to labor and transportation safety. The bill will enforce minimum compensation standards for drivers based on mileage and time spent while transporting riders, thus improving economic security for those engaging in this type of work. Importantly, it introduces the right for TNC drivers to pursue civil action against companies in the event of noncompliance, thereby strengthening labor rights within this burgeoning gig economy. The bill could significantly reshape the labor landscape for those involved in TNC services in Minnesota, pushing for better working conditions and transparency.

Summary

HF2369 aims to establish significant protections for drivers working with transportation network companies (TNCs) in Minnesota. The bill outlines clear guidelines regarding driver deactivation, ensuring that drivers have the right to know the reasons for any action taken against them and the opportunity to appeal such decisions through a reconsideration process. This addresses concerns that drivers have faced arbitrary deactivations without clear recourse. The bill further mandates that TNCs adhere to non-discriminatory practices when interacting with drivers and riders, thereby promoting a fair operating environment for all participants within the system.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HF2369 appears to be supportive, particularly among driver advocacy groups and labor rights organizations, who see it as a necessary measure to provide essential protections and rights for gig workers. However, there may be reservations from TNCs regarding the increased regulation and potential implications for operational flexibility. Overall, the discussions point to a collective recognition of the need for clearer labor standards and protections in the TNC sector, reflecting a growing awareness of workers' rights in the modern economy.

Contention

Discussions around HF2369 highlight several notable points of contention. TNC operators have expressed concern over the operational challenges that could arise from the new rules, particularly related to the complexity of complying with minimum compensation regulations and the potential for increased liability associated with deactivation procedures. Additionally, the breadth of non-discrimination provisions raises questions about how effectively TNCs can implement these policies without impacting their business models. The balance between protecting driver rights and maintaining business efficiency is a crucial point of contention as legislators consider the bill.

Companion Bills

MN SF2319

Similar To Protections establishment for transportation network company drivers

Similar Bills

CA AB2237

Transportation planning: regional transportation improvement plan: sustainable communities strategies: alternative planning strategy: state transportation funding.

CA SB1369

Energy: green electrolytic hydrogen.

CA SB1196

State Transit Assistance Program: eligibility: Anaheim Transportation Network.

HI HB699

Relating To Transportation Network Companies.

HI SB770

Relating To Transportation Network Companies.

UT SB0310

Transportation Utility Fee Amendments

CA AB1525

Transportation projects: priority populations.

TX SB2096

Relating to the creation of and the powers of a comprehensive multimodal urban transportation authority, including the power to impose taxes, issue bonds, and exercise limited eminent domain authority.