Oklahoma 2022 Regular Session

Oklahoma House Bill HB1236

Introduced
2/1/21  
Refer
2/2/21  
Refer
2/16/21  
Report Pass
2/18/21  
Engrossed
3/1/21  
Refer
3/22/21  
Report Pass
4/7/21  
Enrolled
5/20/21  

Caption

Attorney General; duties of Attorney General; State Reserved Powers Protection Unit; providing for review of Presidential executive orders and federal actions; effective date; emergency.

Impact

The enactment of HB 1236 could significantly shift the balance of power between state and federal entities. By enabling the legislature to review executive orders and federal actions, legislators have a direct pathway to challenge federal authority, thus creating a mechanism for state response to perceived federal overreach. Such actions could lead to notable changes in various sectors, including healthcare, environmental regulations, and education, depending on what is deemed unconstitutional by the state authorities. This proactive stance on state rights reflects a broader national conversation about federalism.

Summary

House Bill 1236 establishes the State Reserved Powers Protection Unit within the Office of the Attorney General of Oklahoma. The primary purpose of this unit is to monitor and evaluate federal actions, including executive orders, regulations, and congressional acts, to determine their compliance with the Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. When the unit finds that federal actions infringe on state authority, it empowers the Attorney General to assess whether the state should seek an exemption from these actions or pursue legal measures to declare them unconstitutional. This adds a layer of state oversight over federal mandates and aims to bolster state sovereignty.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 1236 appears to be divided along party lines. Supporters advocate for the bill as a necessary means of preserving state rights and countering federal government overreach, reflecting a strong commitment to constitutional principles. However, opponents express concerns about potential conflicts and the implications of a state-centered review process that might impede effective governance, especially during emergencies when federal interventions may be crucial.

Contention

Key points of contention involve the nature of state versus federal power, particularly in how health emergencies and resource management are handled. Critics argue that delegating the authority to determine constitutionality could lead to fractured responses to national issues, posing risks during events such as pandemics. This bill raises significant questions regarding the limits placed on both state and federal powers, and how those powers are interpreted in practice, fueling ongoing debates about the nature of governance in America.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB710

District attorneys: conflicts of interest.

OK HB2420

Law enforcement; directing the Attorney General to conduct certain investigations; effective date.

OK SB1649

Attorney General; adding certain duties for Office of Attorney General. Emergency.

OK SB1565

Cross-deputization; allowing the Attorney General to cross-deputize law enforcement; clarifying certain liability. Effective date.

CA AB1416

Parole hearings.

OK HB3160

Attorney General; expanding scope of duties of the Attorney General; effective date.

OK HB4210

Attorney General; duties; data; human trafficking; Human Trafficking Response Unit; effective date; emergency.

OK SB1637

Election fraud; authorizing Attorney General to investigate and prosecute certain violations. Effective date.