Oklahoma 2022 Regular Session

Oklahoma Senate Bill SB1466

Introduced
2/7/22  
Refer
2/8/22  
Report Pass
2/17/22  
Engrossed
3/2/22  
Refer
3/28/22  
Report Pass
4/6/22  
Enrolled
5/11/22  

Caption

Crimes and punishments; relating to the raising of flags over tax-supported property; adding an exception. Emergency.

Impact

With the passage of SB1466, Oklahoma's flag display laws will be adjusted to permit the 9/11 Remembrance 'Freedom Flag' on publicly owned properties. This change signifies a broader recognition of tragic historical events at the state level, potentially promoting remembrance activities and state-sponsored commemorations. Additionally, this legalization of a new flag may lead to discussions about other flags and commemorative symbols that could be authorized in the future under similar statutes.

Summary

Senate Bill 1466 aims to amend existing regulations concerning the display of flags on tax-supported property in the State of Oklahoma. The bill specifically authorizes the flying of the 9/11 Remembrance ‘Freedom Flag’ in memory of the September 11 terrorist attacks, thus allowing local government entities and state institutions to display this commemorative flag alongside other recognized flags. The bill serves to honor the memory of the victims of the terrorist attacks on 2001, adding a significant emotional weight to the legislation and embedding it into state recognition.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB1466 appears to be largely positive, with bipartisan support observed during discussions and voting. The acknowledgement of the September 11 attacks resonates deeply with many constituents, and the bill is seen as a respectful gesture towards honoring those affected by the events. However, as with any legislation that modifies existing laws, there are likely some voices of concern regarding the definitive list of flags permitted for display on state properties, reflecting wider dialogues about representation and memorialization.

Contention

While the bill received unanimous support in the Senate with a vote of 46 to 0, there are underlying concerns related to the implications of expanding flag display authorization. Critics may argue about the potential for an extensive list of flags being included in future amendments, which could complicate the laws governing symbols displayed on public property. Furthermore, questions could arise regarding the appropriateness of commemorating certain events through flag displays, leading to debates about inclusivity and representation of various historical narratives.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.